Difference between revisions of "Murray1985"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Stephen O. Murray |Title=Toward a Model of Members' Methods for Recognizing Interruptions |Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn taking; Califomia English c...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Stephen O. Murray | |Author(s)=Stephen O. Murray | ||
| − | |Title=Toward a | + | |Title=Toward a model of members' methods for recognizing interruptions |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn taking; Califomia English conversation; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn taking; Califomia English conversation; | ||
|Key=Murray1985 | |Key=Murray1985 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=14 | |Volume=14 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=31–40 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/toward-a-model-of-members-methods-for-recognizing-interruptions/E955328A8819A63A11C99C379A729987 |
| − | |Abstract= Simultaneous speech is neither necessary nor sufficient for the recognition | + | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404500010927 |
| − | + | |Abstract=Simultaneous speech is neither necessary nor sufficient for the recognition of “interruption” by interlocutors. A peaker's “completion right” is vitiated by how long she has been speaking, how often she has spoken, the number of “points” made in a speaking turn, and the special rights of some speakers to speak about some topics. There are no absolute syntactical or acoustical criteria for recognizing an occurrence of “interruption” available either to those involved in a speech event nor to analysts. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:33, 20 October 2019
| Murray1985 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Murray1985 |
| Author(s) | Stephen O. Murray |
| Title | Toward a model of members' methods for recognizing interruptions |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Turn taking, Califomia English conversation |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1985 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 14 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 31–40 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404500010927 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Simultaneous speech is neither necessary nor sufficient for the recognition of “interruption” by interlocutors. A peaker's “completion right” is vitiated by how long she has been speaking, how often she has spoken, the number of “points” made in a speaking turn, and the special rights of some speakers to speak about some topics. There are no absolute syntactical or acoustical criteria for recognizing an occurrence of “interruption” available either to those involved in a speech event nor to analysts.
Notes
