Difference between revisions of "MHGoodwin1982a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marjorie Harness Goodwin; |Title=Processes of dispute management among urban black children |Tag(s)=EMCA; Dispute; Children; |Key=MHGo...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Marjorie Harness Goodwin;  
+
|Author(s)=Marjorie Harness Goodwin;
 
|Title=Processes of dispute management among urban black children
 
|Title=Processes of dispute management among urban black children
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Dispute; Children;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Dispute; Children;
 
|Key=MHGoodwin1982a
 
|Key=MHGoodwin1982a
 
|Year=1982
 
|Year=1982
 
|Journal=American Ethnologist
 
|Journal=American Ethnologist
 
|Volume=9
 
|Volume=9
|Pages=76-96
+
|Number=1
 +
|Pages=76–96
 +
|URL=https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1525/ae.1982.9.1.02a00050
 +
|DOI=10.1525/ae.1982.9.1.02a00050
 +
|Abstract=This paper investigates the forms and functions of alternative dispute procedures as well as distinctive operating cultures that account for them among urban black working‐class children. It is found that children strategically manage the social organization of a dispute through the selection of particular argument formats. In conducting argumentative exchanges, children display a range of communicative competencies and collaborate in performing highly orderly negotiations of power.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 06:50, 20 October 2019

MHGoodwin1982a
BibType ARTICLE
Key MHGoodwin1982a
Author(s) Marjorie Harness Goodwin
Title Processes of dispute management among urban black children
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Dispute, Children
Publisher
Year 1982
Language
City
Month
Journal American Ethnologist
Volume 9
Number 1
Pages 76–96
URL Link
DOI 10.1525/ae.1982.9.1.02a00050
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper investigates the forms and functions of alternative dispute procedures as well as distinctive operating cultures that account for them among urban black working‐class children. It is found that children strategically manage the social organization of a dispute through the selection of particular argument formats. In conducting argumentative exchanges, children display a range of communicative competencies and collaborate in performing highly orderly negotiations of power.

Notes