Difference between revisions of "Forrester1998"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Michael A. Forrester; Chris Pike |Title=Learning to estimate in the mathematics classroom: A conversation analytic approach |Tag(s)=EMCA...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Michael A. Forrester; | + | |Author(s)=Michael A. Forrester; Christopher D. Pike |
|Title=Learning to estimate in the mathematics classroom: A conversation analytic approach | |Title=Learning to estimate in the mathematics classroom: A conversation analytic approach | ||
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Education; Children; Conversation Analysis; Mathematics; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Education; Children; Conversation Analysis; Mathematics; |
|Key=Forrester1998 | |Key=Forrester1998 | ||
|Year=1998 | |Year=1998 | ||
|Journal=Journal for the Research in Mathematics Education | |Journal=Journal for the Research in Mathematics Education | ||
|Volume=29 | |Volume=29 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Number=3 |
− | |URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/749793 | + | |Pages=334–356 |
+ | |URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/749793 | ||
|DOI=10.2307/749793 | |DOI=10.2307/749793 | ||
|Abstract=In contrast to contemporary estimation researchers who have focused primarily on children's computational estimation abilities, we examined the ideas surrounding the teaching and learning of measurement estimation in the classroom. Employing ethnomethodologically informed conversation analysis, we focused on 2 teachers' instructions during estimation lessons and on pupils' (aged 9-11 years) talk during small-group follow-up activities. The results indicated that estimation is understood as discursively interdependent with measurement and is associated both with teacher-formulated accountability and with vagueness, ambiguity, and guessing. Furthermore, the meaning of what it is to estimate is embedded in practical action. In concluding comments we consider the advantages of using conversational analysis as a method for highlighting the relationships between language and mathematics in the classroom. | |Abstract=In contrast to contemporary estimation researchers who have focused primarily on children's computational estimation abilities, we examined the ideas surrounding the teaching and learning of measurement estimation in the classroom. Employing ethnomethodologically informed conversation analysis, we focused on 2 teachers' instructions during estimation lessons and on pupils' (aged 9-11 years) talk during small-group follow-up activities. The results indicated that estimation is understood as discursively interdependent with measurement and is associated both with teacher-formulated accountability and with vagueness, ambiguity, and guessing. Furthermore, the meaning of what it is to estimate is embedded in practical action. In concluding comments we consider the advantages of using conversational analysis as a method for highlighting the relationships between language and mathematics in the classroom. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 01:01, 20 October 2019
Forrester1998 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Forrester1998 |
Author(s) | Michael A. Forrester, Christopher D. Pike |
Title | Learning to estimate in the mathematics classroom: A conversation analytic approach |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Education, Children, Conversation Analysis, Mathematics |
Publisher | |
Year | 1998 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal for the Research in Mathematics Education |
Volume | 29 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 334–356 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.2307/749793 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In contrast to contemporary estimation researchers who have focused primarily on children's computational estimation abilities, we examined the ideas surrounding the teaching and learning of measurement estimation in the classroom. Employing ethnomethodologically informed conversation analysis, we focused on 2 teachers' instructions during estimation lessons and on pupils' (aged 9-11 years) talk during small-group follow-up activities. The results indicated that estimation is understood as discursively interdependent with measurement and is associated both with teacher-formulated accountability and with vagueness, ambiguity, and guessing. Furthermore, the meaning of what it is to estimate is embedded in practical action. In concluding comments we consider the advantages of using conversational analysis as a method for highlighting the relationships between language and mathematics in the classroom.
Notes