Difference between revisions of "Ogden2001"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Richard Ogden; |Title=Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction |Tag(s)=EMCA; IL; Phonetics; Turn Transiti...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Richard Ogden; | + | |Author(s)=Richard Ogden; |
|Title=Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction | |Title=Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; IL; Phonetics; Turn Transition; Finnish; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; IL; Phonetics; Turn Transition; Finnish; |
|Key=Ogden2001 | |Key=Ogden2001 | ||
|Year=2001 | |Year=2001 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=31 | |Volume=31 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=139–152 |
| + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association/article/turn-transition-creak-and-glottal-stop-in-finnish-talkininteraction/03F69EE8ED3E03E3E02AC0261ACEC1A5 | ||
|DOI=10.1017/S0025100301001116 | |DOI=10.1017/S0025100301001116 | ||
| − | |Abstract=Finnish talk-in-interaction is shown to use creak and glottal stops distinctively. | + | |Abstract=Finnish talk-in-interaction is shown to use creak and glottal stops distinctively. Creak has turn-yielding functions, and glottal stops have turn-holding functions. Rather than either intuition or the use of large corpora with no attention to the interactional function in which the talk is embedded, the methodology used is that of interactional linguistics (e.g. Couper-Kuhlen & Selting 1996 for a prosodic approach), which places emphasis on demonstrating participants' local orientation to linguistic categories within interactional sequences. |
| − | Creak has turn-yielding functions, and glottal stops have turn-holding functions. | ||
| − | Rather than either intuition or the use of large corpora with no attention to the | ||
| − | interactional function in which the talk is embedded, the methodology used is that | ||
| − | of interactional linguistics (e.g. Couper-Kuhlen & Selting 1996 for a prosodic | ||
| − | approach), which places emphasis on demonstrating participants' local orientation | ||
| − | to linguistic categories within interactional sequences. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:20, 18 October 2019
| Ogden2001 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ogden2001 |
| Author(s) | Richard Ogden |
| Title | Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, IL, Phonetics, Turn Transition, Finnish |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2001 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of the International Phonetic Association |
| Volume | 31 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 139–152 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0025100301001116 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Finnish talk-in-interaction is shown to use creak and glottal stops distinctively. Creak has turn-yielding functions, and glottal stops have turn-holding functions. Rather than either intuition or the use of large corpora with no attention to the interactional function in which the talk is embedded, the methodology used is that of interactional linguistics (e.g. Couper-Kuhlen & Selting 1996 for a prosodic approach), which places emphasis on demonstrating participants' local orientation to linguistic categories within interactional sequences.
Notes
