Difference between revisions of "Rooksby-etal2010"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=John; Rooksby; Mark Rouncefield; Ian Sommerville; |Title=Testing in the wild: the social and organisational dimensions of real world pra...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=18 | |Volume=18 | ||
|Number=5-6 | |Number=5-6 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=559–580 |
| + | |URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10606-009-9098-7 | ||
|DOI=10.1007/s10606-009-9098-7 | |DOI=10.1007/s10606-009-9098-7 | ||
| − | |Abstract= | + | |Abstract=Testing is a key part of any systems engineering project. There is an extensive literature on testing, but very little that focuses on how testing is carried out in real-world circumstances. This is partly because current practices are often seen as unsophisticated and ineffective. We believe that by investigating and characterising the real-world work of testing we can help question why such ‘bad practices’ occur and how improvements might be made. We also argue that the testing literature is too focused on technological issues when many of the problems, and indeed strengths, have as much do with work and organisation. In this paper we use empirical examples from four systems engineering projects to demonstrate how and in what ways testing is a cooperative activity. In particular we demonstrate the ways in which testing is situated within organisational work and satisfices organisational and marketplace demands. |
| − | on testing, but very little that focuses on how testing is carried out in real-world circumstances. This | ||
| − | is partly because current practices are often seen as unsophisticated and ineffective. We believe that | ||
| − | by investigating and characterising the real-world work of testing we can help question why such | ||
| − | ‘bad practices’ occur and how improvements might be made. We also argue that the testing | ||
| − | literature is too focused on technological issues when many of the problems, and indeed strengths, | ||
| − | have as much do with work and organisation. In this paper we use empirical examples from four | ||
| − | systems engineering projects to demonstrate how and in what ways testing is a cooperative activity. | ||
| − | In particular we demonstrate the ways in which testing is situated within organisational work and | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:34, 18 October 2019
| Rooksby-etal2010 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Rooksby-etal2010 |
| Author(s) | John, Rooksby, Mark Rouncefield, Ian Sommerville |
| Title | Testing in the wild: the social and organisational dimensions of real world practice |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, dependability, ethnography, ethnomethodology, organisational issues, software development, systems testing, work practices |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2010 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Computer Supported Cooperative Work |
| Volume | 18 |
| Number | 5-6 |
| Pages | 559–580 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10606-009-9098-7 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Testing is a key part of any systems engineering project. There is an extensive literature on testing, but very little that focuses on how testing is carried out in real-world circumstances. This is partly because current practices are often seen as unsophisticated and ineffective. We believe that by investigating and characterising the real-world work of testing we can help question why such ‘bad practices’ occur and how improvements might be made. We also argue that the testing literature is too focused on technological issues when many of the problems, and indeed strengths, have as much do with work and organisation. In this paper we use empirical examples from four systems engineering projects to demonstrate how and in what ways testing is a cooperative activity. In particular we demonstrate the ways in which testing is situated within organisational work and satisfices organisational and marketplace demands.
Notes
