Difference between revisions of "Voutilainen-etal2010b"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Liisa Voutilainen; Anssi Peräkylä; Johanna Ruusuvuori; |Title=Misalignment as a Therapeutic Resource |Tag(s)=EMCA; alliance ruptures;...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
|Pages=299-315 | |Pages=299-315 | ||
+ | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14780880902846411 | ||
|DOI=10.1080/14780880902846411 | |DOI=10.1080/14780880902846411 | ||
− | |Abstract=The article reports conversation analysis of a single cognitive psychotherapy session | + | |Abstract=The article reports conversation analysis of a single cognitive psychotherapy session in which an interactional misalignment between the therapist and the patient emerges, culminates, and is mitigated. Through this case study, the interactional practices leading to a rupture in therapeutic alliance and the practices leading to its mending are explored. In the session the therapist pursues investigative orientation in relation to the patient's experience under discussion, whereas the patient maintains orientation to “troubles-telling.” The diverging projects of the participants amount to overt misalignment. Eventually, the therapist brings the relationship of the patient and herself as a topic of conversation in ways which turn the misalignment into a resource of therapeutic work. The microanalysis of actual interactional patterns in this single case is linked to discussions of therapeutic alliance in psychotherapeutic literature. |
− | in which an interactional misalignment between the therapist and the patient emerges, | ||
− | culminates, and is mitigated. Through this case study, the interactional practices | ||
− | |||
− | explored. In the session the therapist pursues investigative orientation in relation to | ||
− | the | ||
− | “troubles-telling.” The diverging projects of the participants amount to overt | ||
− | |||
− | topic of conversation in ways which turn the misalignment into a resource of | ||
− | |||
− | to discussions of therapeutic alliance in psychotherapeutic literature. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 03:06, 18 October 2019
Voutilainen-etal2010b | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Voutilainen-etal2010b |
Author(s) | Liisa Voutilainen, Anssi Peräkylä, Johanna Ruusuvuori |
Title | Misalignment as a Therapeutic Resource |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, alliance ruptures, cognitive psychotherapy, conversation analysis, emotion, misalignment |
Publisher | |
Year | 2010 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Qualitative Research in Psychology |
Volume | 7 |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 299-315 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1080/14780880902846411 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
The article reports conversation analysis of a single cognitive psychotherapy session in which an interactional misalignment between the therapist and the patient emerges, culminates, and is mitigated. Through this case study, the interactional practices leading to a rupture in therapeutic alliance and the practices leading to its mending are explored. In the session the therapist pursues investigative orientation in relation to the patient's experience under discussion, whereas the patient maintains orientation to “troubles-telling.” The diverging projects of the participants amount to overt misalignment. Eventually, the therapist brings the relationship of the patient and herself as a topic of conversation in ways which turn the misalignment into a resource of therapeutic work. The microanalysis of actual interactional patterns in this single case is linked to discussions of therapeutic alliance in psychotherapeutic literature.
Notes