Difference between revisions of "Waring2019"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) |
m (Clair-AntoineVeyrier moved page Waring-2018 to Waring2019 without leaving a redirect: key/name issue) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Title=Problematizing information-seeking Wh-questions | |Title=Problematizing information-seeking Wh-questions | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Information webinar; Public discourse; Resistance; Presupposition; Questions; Wh-questions | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Information webinar; Public discourse; Resistance; Presupposition; Questions; Wh-questions | ||
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Waring2019 |
|Year=2019 | |Year=2019 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
Latest revision as of 02:41, 7 December 2018
| Waring2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Waring2019 |
| Author(s) | Hansun Zhang Waring |
| Title | Problematizing information-seeking Wh-questions |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Information webinar, Public discourse, Resistance, Presupposition, Questions, Wh-questions |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language & Communication |
| Volume | 64 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 81-90 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.11.001 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Important conversation analytic work has made evident how responses to questions may be designed to resist the terms, agendas, and constraints of those questions (e.g., Heritage, 1998; Lee, 2013; Stivers & Hayashi, 2010). Based on audio-recordings of 17 publicly-available information webinars delivered by a U. S. philanthropic foundation to prospective applicants, the paper describes three methods leveraged by the institutional representatives that treat wh-questions that seek information during Q&A as somewhat “problematic.” Findings extend the current literature by illuminating how resistance to questions may be implemented in an understudied institutional context and contribute to the knowledge base for identifying “best practices” for webinar facilitation (Zoumenou et al., 2015).
Notes
