Difference between revisions of "Burdelski2016"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Conversation analysis;" to "Conversation Analysis;") |
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (author name corrected; free text moved to abstract) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)= | + | |Author(s)=Matthew Burdelski; |
|Title=We-focused and I-focused stories of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum | |Title=We-focused and I-focused stories of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum | ||
|Tag(s)=Conversation Analysis; ethnic discrimination; guided tour; identity; Japanese American history; museum; narrative; positioning; stance; storytelling; World War II; | |Tag(s)=Conversation Analysis; ethnic discrimination; guided tour; identity; Japanese American history; museum; narrative; positioning; stance; storytelling; World War II; | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|URL=http://das.sagepub.com/content/27/2/156.full.pdf+html | |URL=http://das.sagepub.com/content/27/2/156.full.pdf+html | ||
|DOI=10.1177/0957926515611553 | |DOI=10.1177/0957926515611553 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This article examines stories of personal experience of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum and analyzes the positioning practices deployed in constructing identity within the story world and storytelling. In particular, it shows how older Japanese American docents tell we-focused stories in positioning themselves as part of a group of Japanese Americans and family who were relocated and incarcerated during the war, and I-focused stories in positioning themselves as individuals who acted in response to unexpected events linked to relationships and institutions. The analysis points out ways docents display stances toward past events and ways visitors participate in the telling such as by posing questions. It suggests that stories of personal experience are a vehicle for constructing identities that draw upon historical events,autobiographies, story structure, and interactional contingencies. The findings are related to stories as a tool of teaching and engaging museum visitors. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 15:07, 2 November 2018
| Burdelski2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Burdelski2016 |
| Author(s) | Matthew Burdelski |
| Title | We-focused and I-focused stories of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Conversation Analysis, ethnic discrimination, guided tour, identity, Japanese American history, museum, narrative, positioning, stance, storytelling, World War II |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse & Society |
| Volume | 27 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 156-171 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0957926515611553 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article examines stories of personal experience of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum and analyzes the positioning practices deployed in constructing identity within the story world and storytelling. In particular, it shows how older Japanese American docents tell we-focused stories in positioning themselves as part of a group of Japanese Americans and family who were relocated and incarcerated during the war, and I-focused stories in positioning themselves as individuals who acted in response to unexpected events linked to relationships and institutions. The analysis points out ways docents display stances toward past events and ways visitors participate in the telling such as by posing questions. It suggests that stories of personal experience are a vehicle for constructing identities that draw upon historical events,autobiographies, story structure, and interactional contingencies. The findings are related to stories as a tool of teaching and engaging museum visitors.
Notes
