Difference between revisions of "Weatherall-etal2016"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ann Weatherall; Susan Danby; Karin Osvaldsson; Jakob Cromdal; Michael Emmison; |Title=Pranking in Children's Helpline Calls |Tag(s)=EMCA...")
 
m
 
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|Number=2
 
|Number=2
 
|Pages=224-238
 
|Pages=224-238
 +
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.1121532
 
|DOI=10.1080/07268602.2015.1121532
 
|DOI=10.1080/07268602.2015.1121532
 
|Abstract=Pranking can be understood as challenging a normative social order. One environment
 
|Abstract=Pranking can be understood as challenging a normative social order. One environment

Latest revision as of 05:06, 23 September 2018

Weatherall-etal2016
BibType ARTICLE
Key Weatherall-etal2016
Author(s) Ann Weatherall, Susan Danby, Karin Osvaldsson, Jakob Cromdal, Michael Emmison
Title Pranking in Children's Helpline Calls
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Counselling, Hoax, Identity, Membership Categorization, YouTube
Publisher
Year 2016
Language English
City
Month
Journal Australian Journal of Linguistics
Volume 36
Number 2
Pages 224-238
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/07268602.2015.1121532
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Pranking can be understood as challenging a normative social order. One environment where pranking occurs is in institutional interaction. The present study examines a sample of pranking calls to telephone helplines for children and young people. Some cases had been posted on YouTube by the person doing the pranking; others were from a sub- collection of possible pranks, extracted from a larger corpus of Australian children’s counselling helpline calls. Drawing on ethnomethodology and conversation analysis we aim to understand the inferential and sequential resources involved in pranking within telephone-mediated counselling services for children and youth. Our analysis shows pranksters know the norms of counselling helplines by their practices employed for subverting them. YouTube pranksters exploit next turns of talk to retrospectively cast what the counsellor has just said as a possible challenge to the perception of the call as a normal counselling one. One practice evident in both sources was the setting up of provocative traps to break a linguistic taboo. This detailed study of pranking in interaction provides documentary evidence of its idiosyncratic yet patterned local accomplishment in telephone-mediated counselling services aimed at children and youth.

Notes