Difference between revisions of "Wikstroem2016"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Pages=54–62 | |Pages=54–62 | ||
|URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695816300344 | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695816300344 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.dcm.2016.09.003 |
|Abstract=The focus of this study is on how Twitter users construe talk-like tweeting in metalinguistic utterances. In a material of tweets containing or responding to explicit comparisons of tweeting to talking (N=520), a broad range of construals are identified, showing Twitter users associating talk-likeness with, e.g., notions of the textual representation of voice, of grammatical (in-)correctness, of accurately reflecting one׳s ‘real-life’ identity, and of regional or social variation in language use. These associations frequently serve normative functions, enforcing or contesting linguistic and discursive norms in both serious and playful ways. The findings offer a novel perspective on the oft-debated orality of computer-mediated discourse, providing a window on how a process of enregisterment (Agha, 2007) is instantiated and how language norms are actively negotiated by participants in everyday online language use on Twitter. | |Abstract=The focus of this study is on how Twitter users construe talk-like tweeting in metalinguistic utterances. In a material of tweets containing or responding to explicit comparisons of tweeting to talking (N=520), a broad range of construals are identified, showing Twitter users associating talk-likeness with, e.g., notions of the textual representation of voice, of grammatical (in-)correctness, of accurately reflecting one׳s ‘real-life’ identity, and of regional or social variation in language use. These associations frequently serve normative functions, enforcing or contesting linguistic and discursive norms in both serious and playful ways. The findings offer a novel perspective on the oft-debated orality of computer-mediated discourse, providing a window on how a process of enregisterment (Agha, 2007) is instantiated and how language norms are actively negotiated by participants in everyday online language use on Twitter. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:19, 17 September 2018
| Wikstroem2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Wikstroem2016 |
| Author(s) | Peter Wikström |
| Title | when I need/want to: Normativity, identity, and form in user construals of ‘talk-like’ tweeting |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Talk, Orality, Twitter, Normativity, Reflexivity, Enregisterment |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse, Context & Media |
| Volume | 14 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 54–62 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.dcm.2016.09.003 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The focus of this study is on how Twitter users construe talk-like tweeting in metalinguistic utterances. In a material of tweets containing or responding to explicit comparisons of tweeting to talking (N=520), a broad range of construals are identified, showing Twitter users associating talk-likeness with, e.g., notions of the textual representation of voice, of grammatical (in-)correctness, of accurately reflecting one׳s ‘real-life’ identity, and of regional or social variation in language use. These associations frequently serve normative functions, enforcing or contesting linguistic and discursive norms in both serious and playful ways. The findings offer a novel perspective on the oft-debated orality of computer-mediated discourse, providing a window on how a process of enregisterment (Agha, 2007) is instantiated and how language norms are actively negotiated by participants in everyday online language use on Twitter.
Notes
