Difference between revisions of "Tuncer2018"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
m (doi) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Volume=132 | |Volume=132 | ||
|Pages=76–90 | |Pages=76–90 | ||
+ | |URL=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.013 | ||
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.013 | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.013 | ||
|Abstract=This article studies how co-present workers can join in a co-present interaction they were not previously involved in, thus challenging initial participants' interactional preserve. It is based on ethnographically-informed analyses of video-recorded interactions in workplaces, in English as a lingua franca and in French. Potential joiners' recurrent embodied and verbal practices are identified and analyzed, showing regular methods associated with potential joiners' position relative to the F-formation, and different layouts typical of workplaces. Another set of findings bears on how potential joiners shape their move so as to account for joining in at that moment, to project a more or less extended participation, and to implement a collaborative project. Beyond the variety of projects the practice can serve, potential joiners' moves are systematically designed so as to demonstrate their contribution to the progression of work. | |Abstract=This article studies how co-present workers can join in a co-present interaction they were not previously involved in, thus challenging initial participants' interactional preserve. It is based on ethnographically-informed analyses of video-recorded interactions in workplaces, in English as a lingua franca and in French. Potential joiners' recurrent embodied and verbal practices are identified and analyzed, showing regular methods associated with potential joiners' position relative to the F-formation, and different layouts typical of workplaces. Another set of findings bears on how potential joiners shape their move so as to account for joining in at that moment, to project a more or less extended participation, and to implement a collaborative project. Beyond the variety of projects the practice can serve, potential joiners' moves are systematically designed so as to demonstrate their contribution to the progression of work. | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 04:49, 5 June 2018
Tuncer2018 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Tuncer2018 |
Author(s) | Sylvaine Tuncer |
Title | Non-participants joining in an interaction in shared work spaces: Multimodal practices to enter the floor and account for it |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Face-to-face interactions, Multimodal analysis, Joining in an interaction, F-formation, Participation inclusion and exclusion at work |
Publisher | Elsevier BV |
Year | 2018 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | jul |
Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
Volume | 132 |
Number | |
Pages | 76–90 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.013 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article studies how co-present workers can join in a co-present interaction they were not previously involved in, thus challenging initial participants' interactional preserve. It is based on ethnographically-informed analyses of video-recorded interactions in workplaces, in English as a lingua franca and in French. Potential joiners' recurrent embodied and verbal practices are identified and analyzed, showing regular methods associated with potential joiners' position relative to the F-formation, and different layouts typical of workplaces. Another set of findings bears on how potential joiners shape their move so as to account for joining in at that moment, to project a more or less extended participation, and to implement a collaborative project. Beyond the variety of projects the practice can serve, potential joiners' moves are systematically designed so as to demonstrate their contribution to the progression of work.
Notes