Difference between revisions of "Lee2011"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Conversation analysis" to "Conversation Analysis") |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Seung-Hee Lee; | |Author(s)=Seung-Hee Lee; | ||
|Title=Responding at a higher level: Activity progressivity in calls for service | |Title=Responding at a higher level: Activity progressivity in calls for service | ||
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Institutional interaction; Preference; Progressivity; Responses; Type-conformity; |
|Key=Lee2011 | |Key=Lee2011 | ||
|Year=2011 | |Year=2011 |
Revision as of 13:29, 17 May 2018
Lee2011 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Lee2011 |
Author(s) | Seung-Hee Lee |
Title | Responding at a higher level: Activity progressivity in calls for service |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Institutional interaction, Preference, Progressivity, Responses, Type-conformity |
Publisher | |
Year | 2011 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
Volume | 43 |
Number | |
Pages | 904–917 |
URL | |
DOI | doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.028 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In a set of calls to an airline service in which agents ask for customers’ identifying information, some customers respond by providing different, unrequested information. This paper examines these non-direct, nonconforming responses and shows that those customers anticipate hierarchical institution-specific stages in the activity and respond to the higher-level purpose for which the question was produced. Customers thereby promote the progress of the larger activity in an institutionally relevantway. This suggests that participants can depart from type-conformity with an orientation to activity progressivity.
Notes