Difference between revisions of "Zaunbrecher2018"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Nicolas j. Zaunbrecher |Title=Viewing Spontaneity Ethnomethodologically |Tag(s)=EMCA; Spontaneity; Improvisation; Ethnomethodology; Rhet...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 09:23, 3 March 2018
| Zaunbrecher2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Zaunbrecher2018 |
| Author(s) | Nicolas j. Zaunbrecher |
| Title | Viewing Spontaneity Ethnomethodologically |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Spontaneity, Improvisation, Ethnomethodology, Rhetorical analysis, Improvisational theatre |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 41 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| URL | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-017-9442-8 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Abstract In this article, I identify ‘‘spontaneity’’ as a significant but poorly-ana- lyzed term in social theory and description through an overview of tensions between varying technical accounts of spontaneity in research literature. In contrast to conceptually-slippery ‘‘realist’’ accounts of spontaneity, I argue for viewing spon- taneity ethnomethodologically, i.e., as a contextually-emergent social practice. I suggest two directions for future applications of this approach: first, an eth- nomethodological approach to rhetorical analysis of unanalyzed use of the term ‘‘spontaneity’’ in research literature, and second, observational studies of improvi- sational theatre, a social practice in which orientation toward the production of spontaneity by participants is criterial to the identity of the practice.
Notes
