Difference between revisions of "Busch-Danby2016"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Gillian Busch; Susan Danby |Title=From Fledgling Manoeuvres to Methodological Confidence: Conversations Between a Doctoral Student and S...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
− | |BibType= | + | |BibType=INCOLLECTION |
|Author(s)=Gillian Busch; Susan Danby | |Author(s)=Gillian Busch; Susan Danby | ||
|Title=From Fledgling Manoeuvres to Methodological Confidence: Conversations Between a Doctoral Student and Supervisor on Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis to Explore the Everyday Worlds of Children and Families | |Title=From Fledgling Manoeuvres to Methodological Confidence: Conversations Between a Doctoral Student and Supervisor on Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis to Explore the Everyday Worlds of Children and Families | ||
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Professional competence; Training; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Professional competence; Training; |
|Key=Busch-Danby2016 | |Key=Busch-Danby2016 | ||
|Year=2016 | |Year=2016 | ||
+ | |Language=English | ||
|Booktitle=Constructing Methodology for Qualitative Research | |Booktitle=Constructing Methodology for Qualitative Research | ||
|Pages=237-252 | |Pages=237-252 | ||
Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
|DOI=10.1057/978-1-137-59943-8_16 | |DOI=10.1057/978-1-137-59943-8_16 | ||
|Abstract=Busch and Danby engage in a rich and honest dialogue to capture the methodological challenges encountered by a PhD candidate while learning a new methodology. In using storytelling as a device to examine methodological challenges, the perspectives of both the student and the supervisor are communicated. Beginning with an overview of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, the authors pay attention to challenges connected to data collection when using video recording to capture family in situ practices, transcription of data that captures the fine detail of the interaction, and data analysis. While challenges are examined, the authors also provide a number of strategies that support the methodological maneuvering. These include engaging in data sessions with supervisors and with other conversation analysts committing to join the ethnomethodology research community. | |Abstract=Busch and Danby engage in a rich and honest dialogue to capture the methodological challenges encountered by a PhD candidate while learning a new methodology. In using storytelling as a device to examine methodological challenges, the perspectives of both the student and the supervisor are communicated. Beginning with an overview of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, the authors pay attention to challenges connected to data collection when using video recording to capture family in situ practices, transcription of data that captures the fine detail of the interaction, and data analysis. While challenges are examined, the authors also provide a number of strategies that support the methodological maneuvering. These include engaging in data sessions with supervisors and with other conversation analysts committing to join the ethnomethodology research community. | ||
− | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 03:33, 6 December 2017
Busch-Danby2016 | |
---|---|
BibType | INCOLLECTION |
Key | Busch-Danby2016 |
Author(s) | Gillian Busch, Susan Danby |
Title | From Fledgling Manoeuvres to Methodological Confidence: Conversations Between a Doctoral Student and Supervisor on Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis to Explore the Everyday Worlds of Children and Families |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Professional competence, Training |
Publisher | |
Year | 2016 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | 237-252 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1057/978-1-137-59943-8_16 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | Constructing Methodology for Qualitative Research |
Chapter |
Abstract
Busch and Danby engage in a rich and honest dialogue to capture the methodological challenges encountered by a PhD candidate while learning a new methodology. In using storytelling as a device to examine methodological challenges, the perspectives of both the student and the supervisor are communicated. Beginning with an overview of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, the authors pay attention to challenges connected to data collection when using video recording to capture family in situ practices, transcription of data that captures the fine detail of the interaction, and data analysis. While challenges are examined, the authors also provide a number of strategies that support the methodological maneuvering. These include engaging in data sessions with supervisors and with other conversation analysts committing to join the ethnomethodology research community.
Notes