Edit BibEntry: Webb-Heath-vomLehn-Gibson2013

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

NB: Changes to bibliographic entries in the wiki can take 5 minutes to be updated in the bibliographic database. Please be patient after completing your changes.

BibType:
Author(s): Please add multiple authors in Forename I. Surname format, in a list separated by semicolons eg: Harvey Sacks; Emmanuel A. Schegloff; Gail Jefferson (see Adding bibliography entries#Authors)
Title:	Engendering response: professional gesture and the assessment of eyesight in optometry consultations
Editor(s): Please add multiple editors in Forname I. Surname format, in a list separated by semicolons eg. John Drew; Paul Heritage; Maxwell J. Atkinson (see Adding bibliography entries#Authors) for help)
Tag(s): Please add multiple keywords in a semicolon separated list eg: MCA; EMCA - (see Adding bibliography entries#Keywords)
Bibliographical Key: This is a unique bibliographic key. Conventions state it should be something like Authorname1974 where 1974 is the date of publication, but it can be anything unique.
Publisher:
Year:
Language:
Howpublished:
Chapter:
City/Address:
Edition:
Month:
Journal:
Book title:
Volume:
Number:
Pages:
URL:
DOI:
ISBN:
Organization:
Institution:
School:
Series:
Note: Any other relevant notes can be added here
Abstract:	Many of the procedures undertaken within healthcare require specialized forms of participation that may be unfamiliar, even disturbing, to patients or clients. The practitioner has to encourage and enable participation in the investigation in an appropriate fashion while preserving the structure and integrity of the procedure. In this article, we consider optometry and the deployment of a vision test, known as subject refraction, that provides data to help determine the characteristics of any corrective lens that may be required by clients. The procedure's ability to establish robust and reliable data relies upon the optometrist's ability to encourage the client to respond to a series of stimuli without consideration or reflection. That is, the client is required to produce an unwitting response—conduct that might be considered nonsymbolic rather than symbolic. In this article, we also consider the optometrist's talk and bodily comportment during subjective refraction and how it serves to shape and determine the quality of the client's response and participation, and in turn to produce reliable test results.

Free text:

Summary:

This is a minor edit Watch this page

Cancel

Edit BibEntry: Webb-Heath-vomLehn-Gibson2013

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Tools