Edit BibEntry: Vazquez-Carranza2017a

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

NB: Changes to bibliographic entries in the wiki can take 5 minutes to be updated in the bibliographic database. Please be patient after completing your changes.

BibType:
Author(s): Please add multiple authors in Forename I. Surname format, in a list separated by semicolons eg: Harvey Sacks; Emmanuel A. Schegloff; Gail Jefferson (see Adding bibliography entries#Authors)
Title:	Some uses of 'no' in talk-in-interactions
Editor(s): Please add multiple editors in Forname I. Surname format, in a list separated by semicolons eg. John Drew; Paul Heritage; Maxwell J. Atkinson (see Adding bibliography entries#Authors) for help)
Tag(s): Please add multiple keywords in a semicolon separated list eg: MCA; EMCA - (see Adding bibliography entries#Keywords)
Bibliographical Key: This is a unique bibliographic key. Conventions state it should be something like Authorname1974 where 1974 is the date of publication, but it can be anything unique.
Publisher:
Year:
Language:
Howpublished:
Chapter:
City/Address:
Edition:
Month:
Journal:
Book title:
Volume:
Number:
Pages:
URL:
DOI:
ISBN:
Organization:
Institution:
School:
Series:
Note: Any other relevant notes can be added here
Abstract:	Using the methodology of Conversation Analysis, the present investigation studies the particle ‘no’ in Mexican Spanish naturally occurring interactions. ‘No’ is analysed in two sequential contexts: assessment sequences (i.e., two assessments, each produced by different speakers, one after the other) and activity transition (i.e., when speakers go from one activity/topic to another). In the first sequential context ‘no’ appears prefacing an upgraded version of the assessment produced adjacently before (i.e., in second position of the sequence). In this context, ‘no’ works to show primacy of epistemic rights, it marks the previous assessment as an understatement, ‘no’ agrees with the previous assessment’s valence but not with its strength. A multiple saying of ‘no’ prefaces an assessment and makes it more emphatic. In the second sequential context, ‘no’ appears to work as a marker of transition between conversational activities, i.e, speakers use ‘no’ to transit from one activity/topic to another.

Free text:

Summary:

This is a minor edit Watch this page

Cancel

Edit BibEntry: Vazquez-Carranza2017a

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Tools