Edit BibEntry: Hutchby-OReilly-Parker2012

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

NB: Changes to bibliographic entries in the wiki can take 5 minutes to be updated in the bibliographic database. Please be patient after completing your changes.

BibType:
Author(s): Please add multiple authors in Forename I. Surname format, in a list separated by semicolons eg: Harvey Sacks; Emmanuel A. Schegloff; Gail Jefferson (see Adding bibliography entries#Authors)
Title:	Ethics in praxis: Negotiating the presence and functions of a video camera in family therapy
Editor(s): Please add multiple editors in Forname I. Surname format, in a list separated by semicolons eg. John Drew; Paul Heritage; Maxwell J. Atkinson (see Adding bibliography entries#Authors) for help)
Tag(s): Please add multiple keywords in a semicolon separated list eg: MCA; EMCA - (see Adding bibliography entries#Keywords)
Bibliographical Key: This is a unique bibliographic key. Conventions state it should be something like Authorname1974 where 1974 is the date of publication, but it can be anything unique.
Publisher:
Year:
Language:
Howpublished:
Chapter:
City/Address:
Edition:
Month:
Journal:
Book title:
Volume:
Number:
Pages:
URL:
DOI:
ISBN:
Organization:
Institution:
School:
Series:
Note: Any other relevant notes can be added here
Abstract:	The use of video for research purposes is something that has attracted ethical attention and debate. While the usefulness of video as a mechanism to collect data is widely agreed, the ethical sensitivity and impact of recording equipment is more contentious. In some clinical settings the presence of a camera has a dual role, as a portal to a reflecting team and as a recording device to obtain research data. Using data from one such setting, family therapy sessions, this article shows how the role played by recording equipment is negotiated in the course of talk and other activities that constitute sessions. Analysis reveals that members of the therapy interaction orient in different ways and for different purposes to the value of recordings. The article concludes that there are layers of benefit to be derived from recording of clinical interactions, including for members themselves, and this has wider implications for the ways in which qualitative research designs in health sciences are evaluated.

Free text:

Summary:

This is a minor edit Watch this page

Cancel

Edit BibEntry: Hutchby-OReilly-Parker2012

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Tools