Keywords: Prefer
2024
[104]Lucien Tisserand, Heike Baldauf-Quilliatre, (2024), "Rejecting a robot’s offer: An analysis of preference", Discourse & Communication, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 931–941. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[103]Nadja Tadic, (2024), "Preference organization and possible -isms in institutional interaction: The case of adult second language classrooms", Language in Society, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 211–237. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[102]Sarah I. Stolle, Martin Pfeiffer, (2024), "Stand-Alone Facial Gestures as Other-Initiations of Repair", Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, vol. 6, no. 3. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[101]Aafke Diepeveen, (2024), "The suspect's statement in interaction: Responding to ‘formulations’ in the investigative interview", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 220, no. January 2024, pp. 47-61. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2023
[100]Steven E. Clayman, John Heritage, (2023), "Pressuring the President: Changing language practices and the growth of political accountability", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 207, pp. 62–74. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2022
[99]Amber Smits, Guusje Jol, Wyke Stommel, (2022), "“Ik neem dat niet terug”: Een conversatieanalytische studie van terugneemverzoeken in de Tweede Kamer en de rol van de voorzitter", Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 129–155. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[98]Chase Wesley Raymond, Anne Elizabeth Clark White, (2022), "On the recognitionality of references to time in social interaction", Language & Communication, vol. 83, pp. 1-15. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[97]Piera Margutti, (2022), "The multiple constraints of addressed questions in whole-class interaction: Responses from unaddressed pupils", Discourse Studies, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 612-639. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[96]Akiko Imamura, (2022), "Tacit acceptance of compliments after tellings of accomplishment: Contingent management of preferences in Japanese ordinary conversation", Discourse Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 206-230. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2021
[95]Ioana-Maria Stoenica, Sophia Fiedler, (2021), "Multimodal Practice for Mobilizing Response: The Case of Turn-Final Tu Vois ‘You See’ in French Talk-in-Interaction", Frontiers in Communication, vol. 6, pp. eid: 662240. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[94]Danielle Pillet-Shore, (2021), "When to Make the Sensory Social: Registering in Face‐to‐Face Openings", Symbolic Interaction, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 10-39. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[93]Simona Pekarek Doehler, Hilla Polak-Yitzhaki, Xiaoting Li, Ioana-Maria Stoenica, Martin Havlík, Leelo Keevallik, (2021), "Multimodal Assemblies for Prefacing a Dispreferred Response: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis", Frontiers in Communication, Frontiers. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[92]John Heritage, Chase Wesley Raymond, (2021), "Preference and Polarity: Epistemic Stance in Question Design", Research On Language and Social Interaction, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 39-59. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf]
2020
[91]Jun Xu, (2020), "An analysis of Mandarin Chinese final particle ba in dispreferred responses", East Asian Pragmatics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 239–261. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2019
[90]Jun Xu, (2019), "An analysis of Chinese sentence final particle 'ba' in dispreferred responses", East Asian Pragmatics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 239–261. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[89]Susan A. Speer, (2019), "Reconsidering self‐deprecation as a communication practice", British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 806–828. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[88]Jenni Ingram, Nick Andrews, Andrea Pitt, (2019), "When students offer explanations without the teacher explicitly asking them to", Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 51–66. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[87]Derya Duran, Olcay Sert, (2019), "Preference organization in English as a Medium of Instruction classrooms in a Turkish higher education setting", Linguistics and Education, vol. 49, pp. 72–85. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2018
[86]Ana Varela Suárez, (2018), "The question‐answer adjacency pair in dementia discourse", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 86–101. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[85]Karianne Skovholt, (2018), "Anatomy of a teacher–student feedback encounter", Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 69, pp. 142–153. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[84]Anne Warfield Rawls, Waverly Duck, Jason Turowetz, (2018), "Problems Establishing Identity/Residency in a City Neighborhood during a Black/White Police‐Citizen Encounter: Reprising Du Bois’ Conception of Submission as “Submissive Civility”", City & Community, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1015-1050. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[83]Josephine Lee, (2018), "Preference organization as a characterization device in TV sitcoms", The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 167–193. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf]
[82]Leelo Keevallik, (2018), "Making up one’s mind in second position: Estonian no-preface in action plans", In Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages (John Heritage, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, eds.), Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 315–338. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[81]Elliott M. Hoey, Elizabeth Stokoe, (2018), "Eligibility and bad news delivery: How call-takers reject applicants to university", Linguistics and Education, vol. 46, pp. 91–101. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[80]John Heritage, (2018), "Turn-initial particles in English: The cases of oh and well", In Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages (John Heritage, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, eds.), Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 149–184. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[79]Joseph Gafaranga, (2018), "Overall order versus local order in bilingual conversation: A conversation analytic perspective on language alternation", In Conversation Analysis and Language Alternation: Capturing transitions in the classroom (Anna Filipi, Numa Markee, eds.), Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 35–58. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[78]Galina Bolden, (2018), "Nu-prefaced responses in Russian conversation", In Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages (John Heritage, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, eds.), Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 23–58. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[77]Spyridoula Bella, Amalia Moser, (2018), "What's in a first? The link between impromptu invitations and their responses", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 125, pp. 96–110. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2017
[76]Janne Solberg, (2017), "Logic of Accounting: The Case of Reporting Previous Options in Norwegian Activation Encounters", Discourse Processes, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 545-567. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[75]Nicolas Rollet, Varun Jain, Christian Licoppe, Laurence Devillers, (2017), "Towards Interactional Symbiosis: Epistemic Balance and Co-presence in a Quantified Self Experiment", In Symbiotic Interaction 5th International Workshop, Symbiotic 2016 (Padua, Italy, September 29–30, 2016): Revised Selected Papers, Cham, Springer, pp. 143–154. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[74]Danielle Pillet-Shore, (2017), "Preference organization", In The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication (Howard Giles, Jake Harwood, eds.), Oxford, Oxford University Press. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[73]Seung-Hee Lee, (2017), "Acquiescence and Resistance in Disconfirming Responses to Polar Questions", Discourse Processes, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 124-142. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[72]Anne Marie Dalby Landmark, Eirik Hugaas Ofstad, Jan Svennevig, (2017), "Eliciting patient preferences in shared decision-making (SDM): Comparing conversation analysis and SDM measurements", Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 2081-2087. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[71]Tom Koole, Nina Verberg, (2017), "Aligning caller and call-taker: The opening phrase of Dutch emergency calls", Pragmatics and Society, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 129-153. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[70]Kobin H. Kendrick, Judith Holler, (2017), "Gaze Direction Signals Response Preference in Conversation", Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 12-32. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[69]Christopher N. Candlin, Jonathan Chrichton, Stephen H. Moore, (2017), "Why That Now?", In Exploring Discourse in Context and in Action (Christopher N. Candlin, Jonathan Chrichton, Stephen H. Moore, eds.), London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 155–180. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[68]Roxane Bertrand, Aurélie Goujon, (2017), "(Dis)aligning for improving mutual understanding in talk-in-interaction", Revue française de linguistique appliquée, vol. XXII, no. 2, pp. 53–70. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf]
2016
[67]Jeffrey D. Robinson, ed., (2016), "Accountability in Social Interaction", Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 376. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf]
[66]Danielle Pillet-Shore, (2016), "Criticizing another’s child: How teachers evaluate students during parent-teacher conferences", Language in Society, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 33–58. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[65]Letizia Cirillo, Isabel Colón de Carvajal, Anna Claudia Ticca, (2016), "‘I'm sorry + naming the offense’: A format for apologising", Discourse Processes, vol. 53, no. 1-2, pp. 83-96. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2015
[64]Kevin A. Whitehead, (2015), "Everyday antiracism in action: preference organization in responses to racism", Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 374–389. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[63]M. J. van Naerssen, (2015), "Responsive turns in Indonesian informal conversation", Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 189–210. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[62]Johanna Rendle-Short, (2015), "Dispreferred responses when texting: Delaying that ‘no’ response", Discourse & Communication, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 643–661. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[61]Danielle Pillet-Shore, (2015), "Being a “good parent” in parent–teacher conferences", Journal of Communication, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 373–395. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[60]Danielle Pillet-Shore, (2015), "Compliments", In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, Todd Sandel, eds.), London, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1, pp. 193–198. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[59]Innhwa Park, (2015), "Or-prefaced third turn self-repairs in student questions", Linguistics and Education, vol. 31, pp. 101–114. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[58]Kobin H. Kendrick, Francisco Torreira, (2015), "The timing and construction of preference: a quantitative study", Discourse Processes, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 255–289. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[57]Kristen Bottema-Beutel, Rebecca Louick, Rachael White, (2015), "Repetition, response mobilization, and face: Analysis of group interactions with a 19-year-old with Asperger syndrome", Journal of Communication Disorders, vol. 58, pp. 179–193. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2014
[56]Maureen T. Matarese, Carolus van Nijnatten, (2014), "Making a case for client insistence in social work interaction", Discourse Processes, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 670–688. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[55]Kobin H. Kendrick, Paul Drew, (2014), "The putative preference for offers over requests", In Requesting in Social Interaction (Paul Drew, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds.), Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 87–114. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[54]Sara Keel, (2014), "L'organisation préférentielle des accords dans le quotidien familial: le cas des accords parentaux suite à un tour évaluatif de l'enfant", In Corps en interaction: participation, spatialité, mobilité (Lorenza Mondada, ed.), Lyon, ENS Editions, pp. 145–191. [bibtex] [edit]
[53]Jack Bilmes, (2014), "Preference and the conversation analytic endeavor", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 64, pp. 52–71. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[52]Saad Al-Gahtani, Carsten Roever, (2014), "Preference structure in L2 Arabic requests", Intercultural Pragmatics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 619-643. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2013
[51]Anita Pomerantz, John Heritage, (2013), "Preference", In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers, eds.), Oxford, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 210–228. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[50]Yuri Hosoda, David Aline, (2013), "Two preferences in question–answer sequences in language classroom context", Classroom Discourse, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 63–88. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[49]Joe Blythe, (2013), "Preference organization driving structuration: Evidence from Australian Aboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalization", Language, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 883–919. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2012
[48]Susan A. Speer, (2012), "The interactional organization of self-praise: epistemics, preference organisation and implications for identity research", Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 52–79. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2011
[47]Lisa Raevaara, (2011), "Accounts at convenience stores: Doing dispreference and small talk", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 556–571. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[46]Danielle Pillet-Shore, (2011), "Doing introductions: the work involved in meeting someone new", Communication Monographs, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 73–95. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[45]Seung-Hee Lee, (2011), "Responding at a higher level: Activity progressivity in calls for service", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 904–917. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[44]Israel Berger, (2011), "Support and evidence for considering local contingencies in studying and transcribing silence in conversation", Pragmatics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 411–430. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2010
[43]Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Thorsten Huth, (2010), "L2 Requests: Preference Structure in Talk-in-Interaction", Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 185–202. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[42]Tanya Stivers, Federico Rossano, (2010), "Mobilizing response", Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 3–31. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[41]Kari Rønneberg, Jan Svennevig, (2010), "Declining to help: Rejections in service requests to the police", Discourse & Communication, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 279–305. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[40]Jeffrey D. Robinson, Galina B. Bolden, (2010), "Preference organization of sequence-initiating actions: the case of explicit account solicitations", Discourse Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 501–533. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[39]Danielle Pillet-Shore, (2010), "Making way and making sense: including newcomers in interaction", Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 152–175. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[38]Anna Filipi, Roger Wales, (2010), "The organization of assessments produced by children and adults in task based talk", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 3114-3129. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2009
[37]Leendert Plug, (2009), "On Tempo in Dispreferred Turns: A Recurrent Pattern in a Dutch Corpus", In Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics (Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Nicole Dehé, Anne Wichmann, eds.), Emerald, pp. 225–256. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[36]Chiara M. Monzoni, (2009), "Direct complaints in (Italian) calls to the ambulance: The use of negatively framed questions", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2465–2478. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[35]Helena Kangasharju, (2009), "Preference for disagreement? A comparison of three disputes", In Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions (Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, Jan Lindström, eds.), Helsinki, Finnish Literature Society (SKS), pp. 231–253. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf]
[34]John Hellermann, (2009), "Practices for dispreferred responses using 'no' by a learner of English", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 95–126. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[33]Amelia Church, (2009), "Preference Organisation and Peer Disputes: How Young Children Resolve Conflict", Aldershot, Ashgate. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf]
2008
[32]Hiroko Tanaka, (2008), "Delaying dispreferred responses in English: from a Japanese perspective", Language in Society, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 487–513. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[31]Jan Svennevig, (2008), "Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 333–348. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[30]Elisabeth Stokoe, (2008), "Dispreferred actions and other interactional breaches as devices for occasioning audience laughter in television sitcoms", Social Semiotics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 289–307. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[29]Letícia Ludwig Loder, Paola Guimaraens Salimen, Marden Müller, (2008), "Noções fundamentais: sequencialidade, adjacência e preferência", In Fala-em-interação social: introdução à Análise da Conversa Etnometodológica (Letícia Ludwig Loder, Neiva Maria Jung, eds.), Campinas, São Paulo (Brazil)), Mercado de Letras, pp. 39–58. [bibtex] [edit]
[28]Birte Asmuß, (2008), "Performance appraisal interviews: preference organization in assessment sequences", The Journal of Business Communication, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 408–429. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2007
[27]Hansun Zhang Waring, (2007), "Complex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetries", Text & Talk, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 107–137. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[26]Emanuel A. Schegloff, (2007), "Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 1", Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf]
2006
[25]Gonen Hacohen, Emanuel A. Schegloff, (2006), "On the preference for minimization in referring to persons: evidence from Hebrew conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1305–1312. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2005
[24]Hiroko Tanaka, (2005), "Grammar and the “timing” of social action: word order and preference organization in Japanese", Language in Society, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 389–430. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[23]Jakob Steensig, Birte Asmuß, (2005), "Notes on disaligning ‘yes but’ initiated utterances in Danish and German conversations: two construction types for dispreferred responses", In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction (Auli Hakulinen, Margret Selting, eds.), Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 349–373. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[22]Irene Koshik, (2005), "Alternative questions in conversational repair", Discourse Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 192–211. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[21]Trine Heinemann, (2005), "Where grammar and interaction meet: the preference for matched polarity in responsive turns in Danish", In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction (Auli Hakilinen, Margret Selting, eds.), Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 375–402. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2004
[20]Harrie Mazeland, (2004), "Responding to the double implication of telemarketers' opinion queries", Discourse Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 95–115. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[19]Jacqueline Léon, (2004), "Preference and Bias in the Format of French News Interviews: The Semantic Analysis of Question–Answer Pairs in Conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1885–1920. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2002
[18]Hansun Zhang Waring, (2002), "Expressing noncomprehension in a US graduate seminar", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1711–1731. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[17]Hiroko Tanaka, Mihoko Fukushima, (2002), "Gender orientations to outward appearance in Japanese conversation: a study in grammar and interaction", Discourse & Society, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 749–765. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[16]John Heritage, (2002), "The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 34, no. 10-11, pp. 1427-1446. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[15]Andrea Golato, (2002), "German Compliment Responses", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 547–571. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2001
[14]Joseph Gafaranga, (2001), "Linguistic Identities in Talk-in-Interaction: Order in Bilingual Conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1901–1925. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2000
[13]Ronald Boyle, (2000), "Whatever happened to preference organisation?", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 583–604. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
1996
[12]Gene H. Lerner, (1996), "Finding face in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction", Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 303–321. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
1993
[11]Helga Kotthoff, (1993), "Disagreement and concession in disputes: on the context sensitivity of preference structures", Language in Society, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 193-216. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
1992
[10]Justine Coupland, Nikolas Coupland, Jeffrey D. Robinson, (1992), "“How are you?”: negotiating phatic communication", Language in Society, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 207–230. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
1991
[9]Neal R. Norrick, (1991), "On the organization of corrective exchanges in conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 59–83. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[8]Victoria Leto DeFrancisco, (1991), "The sounds of silence: how men silence women in marital relations", Discourse & Society, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 413–423. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[7]Jack Bilmes, (1991), "Toward a theory of argument in conversation: the preference for disagreement", In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation (Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, eds.), Amsterdam, SISCAT, pp. 462–469. [bibtex] [edit]
1990
[6]Noelie Rodriguez, Alan Ryave, (1990), "Telling lies in everyday life: Motivational and organizational consequences of sequential preferences", Qualitative Sociology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 195–210. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
1988
[5]Michel de Fornel, (1988), "Constructions disloquées, mouvement thématique et organisation préférentielle dans la conversation", Langue française, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 101–123. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[4]Jack Bilmes, (1988), "The concept of preference in conversation analysis", Language in Society, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 161–181. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
1987
[3]Harvey Sacks, (1987), "On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation", In Talk and Social Organisation (Graham Button, John R.E. Lee, eds.), Clevedon, Multilingual Matters, pp. 54-69. [bibtex] [edit]
1984
[2]Anita Pomerantz, (1984), "Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes", In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (J. Maxwell Atkinson, John Heritage, eds.), Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101. [bibtex] [edit]
1979
[1]Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A. Schegloff, (1979), "Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction", In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (George Psathas, ed.), New York, Irvington, pp. 15–21. [bibtex] [edit]