Keywords: Deontic
2023
[54]Iira Rautiainen, Pentti Haddington, Antti Kamunen, (2023), "Nudging Questions as Devices for Prompting Courses of Action and Negotiating Deontic (A)symmetry in UN Military Observer Training", In Complexity of Interaction: Studies in Multimodal Conversation Analysis (Pentti Haddington, Tiina Eilittä, Antti Kamunen, Laura Kohonen-Aho, Iira Rautiainen, Anna Vatanen, eds.), Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 217-252. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[53]Satomi Kuroshima, (2023), "When a request turn is segmented: Managing the deontic authority via early compliance", Discourse Studies, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 114-135. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[52]Helene Killmer, Jan Svennevig, Suzanne Beeke, (2023), "Requests to children by parents with aphasia", Aphasiology, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1363–1385. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[51]Helene Killmer, (2023), "How parents with aphasia deal with children’s resistance to requests", Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[50]Natalie Flint, Catrin S. Rhys, (2023), "Teenage Resistance to a Parental Threat: Intercepting an Action-in-Progress as a Form of Resistance", Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 42, no. 5-6, pp. 610-629. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[49]Mats Ekström, Melisa Stevanovic, (2023), "Conversation analysis and power: Examining the descendants and antecedents of social action", Frontiers in Sociology, vol. 8, pp. 1196672. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[48]Evi Dalmaijer, Berber Pas, Wilbert Spooren, Wyke Stommel, (2023), "How technology shapes advice: professional–parent interaction in a digital pediatric treatment", Frontiers in Communication, vol. 8. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2022
[47]Yaxin Wu, Shuai Yang, (2022), "Power plays in action formation: The TCU-final particle ba (吧) in Mandarin Chinese conversation", Discourse Studies, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 491-513. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[46]Melisa Stevanovic, Elina Weiste, Lise-Lotte Uusitalo, (2022), "Challenges of client participation in the co-development of social and health care services: Imbalances of control over action and the management of the interactional agenda", SSM-Qualitative Research in Health, vol. 2, pp. 100136. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[45]Katerina Nanouri, Eleftheria Tseliou, Georgios Abakoumkin, Nikos Bozatzis, (2022), "‘Who decided this?’: Negotiating epistemic and deontic authority in systemic family therapy training", Discourse Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 94-114. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[44]Maria Frick, Elina Palola, (2022), "Deontic Autonomy in Family Interaction: Directive Actions and the Multimodal Organization of Going to the Bathroom", Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, vol. 5, no. 1. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[43]Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Sandra A. Thompson, (2022), "Action Ascription and Deonticity in Everyday Advice-Giving Sequences", In Action Ascription in Social Interaction (Arnulf Deppermann, Michael Haugh, eds.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–207. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2021
[42]Jörg Zinken, Julia Kaiser, Matylda Weidner, Lorenza Mondada, Giovanni Rossi, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, (2021), "Rule Talk: Instructing Proper Play With Impersonal Deontic Statements", Frontiers in Communication, vol. 6, pp. eid: 660394. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[41]Sandra A. Thompson, Barbara A. Fox, Chase Wesley Raymond, (2021), "The grammar of proposals for joint activities", Interactional Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 123–151. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[40]Emma Tennent, (2021), "Identity and action: Help-seeking requests in calls to a victim support service", British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1241–1261. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[39]Melisa Stevanovic, (2021), "Deontic authority and the maintenance of lay and expert identities during joint decision making: Balancing resistance and compliance", Discourse Studies, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 670-689. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[38]Ben Ong, Scott Barnes, Niels Buus, (2021), "Downgrading Deontic Authority in Open Dialogue Reflection Proposals: A Conversation Analysis", Family Process, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1217–1232. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[37]John Heritage, (2021), "The Expression of Authority in US Primary Care:  Offering Diagnoses and Recommending Treatment", In Approaches to Discourse Analysis  (Cynthia Gordon, ed.), Georgetown University Press, pp. 104-122. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[36]Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, (2021), "The prosody and phonetics of OKAY in American English", In OKAY across Languages: Toward a Comparative Approach to its Use in Talk-in-Interaction (Emma Betz, Arnulf Deppermann, Lorenza Mondada, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, eds.), Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 132–173. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[35]Ilkka Arminen, Mika Simonen, (2021), "Expertise as a domain in interaction", Discourse Studies, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 577-596. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2020
[34]Ann Weatherall, (2020), "Constituting Agency in the Delivery of Telephone-Mediated Victim Support", Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 396-412. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[33]Christian Dyrlund Wåhlin-Jacobsen, Johan Simonsen Abildgaard, (2020), "Only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches? Deontics and epistemics in discussions of health and well-being in participatory workplace settings", Discourse & Communication, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 44–64. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[32]Dorien Van De Mieroop, Jonathan Clifton, Avril Verhelst, (2020), "Investigating the interplay between formal and informal leaders in a shared leadership configuration: A multimodal conversation analytical study", Human Relations, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 490–515. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[31]Sandra A. Thompson, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, (2020), "English why don’t you X as a formulaic expression", In Fixed Expressions: Building Language Structure and Social Action (Ritva Laury, Tsuyoshi Ono, eds.), Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 99-132. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[30]Johanna Ruusuvuori, Tarja Aaltonen, Eila Lonka, Inkeri Salmenlinna, Minna Laakso, (2020), "Discussing Hearing Aid Rehabilitation at the Hearing Clinic: Patient Involvement in Deciding upon the Need for a Hearing Aid", Health Communication, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1146-1161. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[29]Lisa Mikesell, F. Alethea Marti, Jennifer R. Guzmán, Michael McCreary, Bonnie T. Zima, (2020), "Attending to Parent and Child Rights to Make Medication Decisions During Pediatric Psychiatry Visits", pp. 69-94. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[28]Simon Magnusson, (2020), "Constructing young citizens’ deontic authority in participatory democracy meetings", Discourse & Communication, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 600–618. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2019
[27]Cordet Smart, Christianne Pollock, Lindsay Aikman, Erica Willoughby, (2019), "Power struggles in MDT meetings: using different orders of interaction to understand the interplay of hierarchy, knowledge and accountability", In Interprofessional Care and Mental Health: The Language of Mental Health (Cordet Smart, Timothy Auburn, eds.), Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 97–121. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[26]Yongping Ran, Xu Huang, (2019), "Deontic authority in intervention discourse: Insights from bystander intervention", Discourse Studies, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 540–560. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[25]Ilana Mushin, Rod Gardner, Claire Gourlay, (2019), "Preparing for task: Linguistic formats for procedural instructions in early years schooling", Linguistics and Education, vol. 54, no. December 2019, pp. 100749. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[24]Letizia Caronia, Chiara Dalledonne Vandini, (2019), "Assessing a (gifted) child in parent-teacher conference: Participants’ resources to pursue (and resist) a no-problem trajectory", Language and Dialogue, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 125–148. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2018
[23]Ann Weatherall, David M Edmonds, (2018), "Speakers formulating their talk as interruptive", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 123, pp. 11–23. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[22]Melisa Stevanovic, (2018), "Social deontics: A nano‐level approach to human power play", Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 369–389. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[21]Melisa Stevanovic, Sonja E. Koski, (2018), "Intersubjectivity and the domains of social interaction: Proposal of a cross-sectional approach", Psychology of Language and Communication, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 39–70. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[20]Jonathan Clifton, Dorien Van De Mieroop, Prachee Sehgal, Dr. Aneet, (2018), "The multimodal enactment of deontic and epistemic authority in Indian meetings", Pragmatics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 333–360. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2017
[19]Melisa Stevanovic, (2017), "Managing compliance in violin instruction", In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action (Liisa Raevaara Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds.), Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 357–380. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[18]Marja-Leena Sorjonen, (2017), "Imperatives and responsiveness in Finnish conversation", In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action (Liisa Raevaara Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds.), Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 241–270. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[17]Peter Muntigl, Lynda Chubak, Lynne Angus, (2017), "Entering chair work in psychotherapy: An interactional structure for getting emotion-focused talk underway", Journal of Pragmatics, Elsevier B.V., vol. 117, pp. 168–189. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[16]Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Marja Etelämäki, (2017), "In the face of resistance", In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action (Liisa Raevaara Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds.), Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 215–240. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[15]Galina Bolden, (2017), "Requests for here-and-now actions in Russian conversation", In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action (Liisa Raevaara Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds.), Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 175–211. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2016
[14]Riikka Nissi, Esa Lehtinen, (2016), "Negotiation of expertise and multifunctionality: PowerPoint presentations as interactional activity types in workplace meetings", Language & Communication, vol. 48, pp. 1–17. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2015
[13]Matylda Weidner, (2015), "Telling somebody what to tell: “Proszę mi powiedzieć” in Polish doctor–patient interaction", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 78, pp. 70–83. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[12]Sylvaine Tuncer, (2015), "Walking away: an embodied resource to close informal encounters in offices", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 76, pp. 101–116. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[11]Melisa Stevanovic, (2015), "Displays of uncertainty and proximal deontic claims: The case of proposal sequences", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 78, pp. 84–97. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[10]Melisa Stevanovic, Jan Svennevig, (2015), "Introduction: Epistemics and deontics in conversational directives", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 78, pp. 1–6. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[9]Innhwa Park, (2015), "Requests: Knowledge and entitlement in writing tutoring", Language and Communication, vol. 43, pp. 1–10. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[8]Anna Lindström, Ann Weatherall, (2015), "Orientations to epistemics and deontics in treatment discussions", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 78, pp. 39–53. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[7]Anne Marie Dalby Landmark, Jan Svennevig, Pål Gulbrandsen, (2015), "Whose decision? Negotiating epistemic and deontic rights in medical treatment decisions", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 78, pp. 54–69. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[6]Katie Ekberg, Amanda LeCouteur, (2015), "Clients' resistance to therapists' proposals: Managing epistemic and deontic status", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 90, pp. 12–25. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[5]Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Marja Etelämäki, (2015), "Nominated actions and their targeted agents in Finnish conversational directives", Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 78, pp. 7–24. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2014
[4]Melisa Stevanovic, Anssi Peräkylä, (2014), "Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations", Language in Society, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 185–207. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
[3]Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson, (2014), "Forms of responsivity: Grammatical formats for responding to two types of request in conversation", In Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic, and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation (Susanne Günther, Wolfgang Imo, Jörg Bücker, eds.), Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 109–138. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2012
[2]Charles Antaki, (2012), "Affiliative and disaffiliative candidate understandings", Discourse Studies, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 531–547. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf] [doi]
2011
[1]Melisa Stevanovic, (2011), "Participants’ deontic rights and action formation: the case of declarative requests for action", InLiSt: Interaction and Linguistic Structures, vol. 52. [bibtex] [edit] [pdf]