Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speer's “natural” and “contrived” data: a sustainable distinction?

Have, Paul ten

doi:10.1177/14614456020040040701

by Paul ten Have

Reference:

Paul ten Have, (2002), "Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speer's “natural” and “contrived” data: a sustainable distinction?", Discourse Studies, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 527–530.

Bibtex Entry:

@ARTICLE{TenHave2002c,
  author = "Paul ten Have", 
  doi = "10.1177/14614456020040040701", 
  keywords = "Data quality, EMCA", 
  journal = "Discourse Studies", 
  number = "4", 
  pages = "527–530", 
  title = "Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speer's “natural” and “contrived” data: a sustainable distinction?", 
  url = "https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614456020040040701", 
  volume = "4", 
  year = "2002", 
}