‘Your comments are meaner than your score’: score calibration talk influences intra- and inter-panel variability during scientific grant peer review

Pier, Elizabeth L.; Raclaw, Joshua; Kaatz, Anna; Brauer, Markus; Carnes, Molly; Nathan, Mitchell J.; Ford, Cecilia E.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw025

by Elizabeth L. Pier, Joshua Raclaw, Anna Kaatz, Markus Brauer, Molly Carnes, Mitchell J. Nathan, Cecilia E. Ford

Reference:

Elizabeth L. Pier, Joshua Raclaw, Anna Kaatz, Markus Brauer, Molly Carnes, Mitchell J. Nathan, Cecilia E. Ford, (2017), "‘Your comments are meaner than your score’: score calibration talk influences intra- and inter-panel variability during scientific grant peer review", Research Evaluation, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1-14.

Bibtex Entry:

@ARTICLE{Pier-etal2017,
  author = "Elizabeth L. Pier, Joshua Raclaw, Anna Kaatz, Markus Brauer, Molly Carnes, Mitchell J. Nathan and Cecilia E. Ford", 
  doi = "https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw025", 
  keywords = "EMCA, Peer review, Decision Making, Collaboration", 
  journal = "Research Evaluation", 
  number = "1", 
  pages = "1-14", 
  title = "‘Your comments are meaner than your score’: score calibration talk influences intra- and inter-panel variability during scientific grant peer review", 
  url = "https://academic.oup.com/rev/article-abstract/26/1/1/2997579/Your-comments-are-meaner-than-your-score-score?redirectedFrom=fulltext", 
  volume = "26", 
  year = "2017", 
}