by Mathias Broth, Hannah R. M. Pelikan
Reference:
Mathias Broth, Hannah R. M. Pelikan, (2016), "Why that Nao?: how humans adapt to a conventional humanoid robot in taking turns-at-talk", In CHI'16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, ACM, pp. 4921–4932.
Bibtex Entry:
@INPROCEEDINGS{PelikanBroth2016,
address = "New York, NY, USA",
author = "Mathias Broth and Hannah R. M. Pelikan",
booktitle = "CHI'16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems",
doi = "10.1145/2858036.2858478",
keywords = "EMCA, Conversation analysis, Human-robot interaction, Recipient design, Sequence organization, Turn-taking, AI reference list",
pages = "4921–4932",
publisher = "ACM",
title = "Why that Nao?: how humans adapt to a conventional humanoid robot in taking turns-at-talk",
url = "http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2858036.2858478",
year = "2016",
}