Yoon2014

From emcawiki
Revision as of 04:09, 30 September 2014 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Sungwon Yoon; Miranda Chan; Wai Ka Hung; Marcus Ying; Amy Or; Wendy WT Lam |Title=Communicative characteristics of interactions between...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Yoon2014
BibType ARTICLE
Key Yoon2014
Author(s) Sungwon Yoon, Miranda Chan, Wai Ka Hung, Marcus Ying, Amy Or, Wendy WT Lam
Title Communicative characteristics of interactions between surgeons and Chinese women with breast cancer in oncology consultation: a conversation analysis

Communicative characteristics of interactions between surgeons and Chinese women with breast cancer in oncology consultation: a conversation analysis

Editor(s)
Tag(s)
Publisher
Year 2014
Language
City
Month
Journal Health Expectations
Volume
Number
Pages
URL
DOI 10.1111/hex.12260
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Background While previous studies have analysed features of interaction in cancer consultations using observational coding frames, relatively little attention is being given to how actual interactions are sequentially organized and achieved by participants in the course of talk-in-interaction. Research into the interactional practices in consultations, which involves Chinese patients, is largely absent.

Objective To provide insight into the talk-in-interaction in surgical-oncology consultations in the context of a Chinese medical setting.

Methods Thirty-one consultations involving 31 patients with breast cancer and eight surgeons were videotaped. The recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using conversation analysis.

Results The manner in which surgeons delivered the diagnostic results was fairly similar across all the consultations. Most surgeons gave the diagnosis in a very straightforward and abrupt manner at the outset of the consultation with no mitigation. While patients in our study conformed to the traditional information giving and receiving roles, how information was presented by surgeons shaped the subsequent sequential organization of surgeon-patient interaction and turn-taking patterns. More importantly, there was a tendency by the surgeons to move from issues of psychosocial nature to clinical matters regardless of the topics taken up in the specific encounter.

Conclusions This study demonstrated the potential of conversation analysis as a context-sensitive method that enabled researchers to gain a more thorough understanding of dynamics of interaction in cancer consultations, thereby informing training interventions for surgeons. Our findings underscore the importance of discursive practices in shaping and encouraging (or discouraging) patient participation in oncology consultation.

Notes