Difference between revisions of "Wilson1970a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (SaulAlbert moved page Wilson1970 to Wilson1970a)
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=35
 
|Volume=35
 
|Number=4
 
|Number=4
|Pages=697-710
+
|Pages=697–710
 +
|URL=https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2093945
 +
|DOI=10.2307/2093945
 +
|Abstract=Two different conceptions of social interaction, the "normative" and the "interpretive," are examined in terms of the mode of description required for deductive explanation. It is shown that if social interaction is an interpretive process, descriptions of interaction cannot satisfy the requirement for literal description imposed by the logic of deductive explanation. Consequently, sociological explanations of patterns of action must necessarily be interpretive and purposive, in the sense developed by Weber and Kaplan. In addition, this view of social interaction suggests that the process of interpretation itself be taken as a phenomenon for investigations as proposed in ethnomethodology and sociolinguistics.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 07:17, 28 October 2019

Wilson1970a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Wilson1970a
Author(s) Thomas P. Wilson
Title Conceptions of interaction and forms of sociological explanation
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA
Publisher
Year 1970
Language
City
Month
Journal American Sociological Review
Volume 35
Number 4
Pages 697–710
URL Link
DOI 10.2307/2093945
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Two different conceptions of social interaction, the "normative" and the "interpretive," are examined in terms of the mode of description required for deductive explanation. It is shown that if social interaction is an interpretive process, descriptions of interaction cannot satisfy the requirement for literal description imposed by the logic of deductive explanation. Consequently, sociological explanations of patterns of action must necessarily be interpretive and purposive, in the sense developed by Weber and Kaplan. In addition, this view of social interaction suggests that the process of interpretation itself be taken as a phenomenon for investigations as proposed in ethnomethodology and sociolinguistics.

Notes