Difference between revisions of "Wilkinson2019"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ray Wilkinson; |Title=Atypical Interaction: Conversation Analysis and Communicative Impairments |Tag(s)=EMCA; Atypical interaction; Comm...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Ray Wilkinson;
 
|Author(s)=Ray Wilkinson;
|Title=Atypical Interaction: Conversation Analysis and Communicative Impairments
+
|Title=Atypical interaction: conversation analysis and communicative impairments
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Atypical interaction; Communicative impairment
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Atypical interaction; Communicative impairment
 
|Key=Wilkinson2019
 
|Key=Wilkinson2019
 
|Year=2019
 
|Year=2019
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
|Journal=Research on Language & Social Interaction
+
|Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction
 
|Volume=52
 
|Volume=52
 
|Number=3
 
|Number=3
|Pages=281-299
+
|Pages=281–299
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631045
+
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631045
 
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2019.1631045
 
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2019.1631045
|Abstract=In this article I review conversation analytic work on “atypical interac-
+
|Abstract=In this article I review conversation analytic work on “atypical interaction”—social interactions where a participant has a communicative impairment. Drawing together some of the main themes and findings in the field, I highlight three forms of atypicality in these interactions, with each linked to more than one type of communicative impairment: (a) atypical forms of delay in TCU progressivity; (b) atypical problems of understandability, intelligibility, and hearing; and (c) atypical actions. I also discuss forms of atypicality that appear to arise from one or more participants adapting their talk or conduct to deal with the impact of the impairment within interaction. The article concludes with some considerations of directions that future work in this field might take. Data are in British and Australian English.
tion”—social interactions where a participant has a communicative
 
impairment. Drawing together some of the main themes and findings
 
in the field, I highlight three forms of atypicality in these interactions,
 
with each linked to more than one type of communicative impairment:
 
(a) atypical forms of delay in TCU progressivity; (b) atypical problems of
 
understandability, intelligibility, and hearing; and (c) atypical actions.
 
I also discuss forms of atypicality that appear to arise from one or
 
more participants adapting their talk or conduct to deal with the impact
 
of the impairment within interaction. The article concludes with some
 
considerations of directions that future work in this field might take.
 
Data are in British and Australian English.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:03, 15 January 2020

Wilkinson2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Wilkinson2019
Author(s) Ray Wilkinson
Title Atypical interaction: conversation analysis and communicative impairments
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Atypical interaction, Communicative impairment
Publisher
Year 2019
Language English
City
Month
Journal Research on Language and Social Interaction
Volume 52
Number 3
Pages 281–299
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/08351813.2019.1631045
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this article I review conversation analytic work on “atypical interaction”—social interactions where a participant has a communicative impairment. Drawing together some of the main themes and findings in the field, I highlight three forms of atypicality in these interactions, with each linked to more than one type of communicative impairment: (a) atypical forms of delay in TCU progressivity; (b) atypical problems of understandability, intelligibility, and hearing; and (c) atypical actions. I also discuss forms of atypicality that appear to arise from one or more participants adapting their talk or conduct to deal with the impact of the impairment within interaction. The article concludes with some considerations of directions that future work in this field might take. Data are in British and Australian English.

Notes