Difference between revisions of "Whitehead2018"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Kevin A. Whitehead; |Title=Managing the Moral Accountability of Stereotyping |Tag(s)=EMCA; In Press; Stereotyping; Morality; Discursive...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Kevin A. Whitehead;  
+
|Author(s)=Kevin A. Whitehead;
 
|Title=Managing the Moral Accountability of Stereotyping
 
|Title=Managing the Moral Accountability of Stereotyping
|Tag(s)=EMCA; In Press; Stereotyping; Morality; Discursive Psychology; Radio;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; In Press; Stereotyping; Morality; Discursive Psychology; Radio;
 
|Key=Whitehead2017
 
|Key=Whitehead2017
|Year=2017
+
|Year=2018
 +
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Journal of Language and Social Psychology
 
|Journal=Journal of Language and Social Psychology
 +
|Volume=37
 +
|Number=3
 +
|Pages=288  –309
 
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0261927X17723679
 
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0261927X17723679
 
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17723679
 
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17723679
 
|Abstract=This article addresses some ways in which stereotypes and stereotyping are treated as morally accountable by social psychologists, their research participants, and participants in everyday interactions. I focus in particular on closely examining some deployments and responses to stereotypes in everyday interactions by applying conversation analytic and discursive psychological approaches to recorded interactions from radio call-in shows. My analysis considers the different interactional trajectories that follow the production of (possible) racial stereotypes, demonstrating how participants treat their “inaccuracy” as a central basis for the production of challenges and moral sanctioning in response to their deployment. In addition, the analysis demonstrates some cases in which apparent stereotypes are accepted or aligned with, including those grounded in personal experiences, “self-stereotypes,” and humorous uses of stereotypes. I conclude by considering the implications of attending to the social–moral contexts in which stereotypes are produced, and the participant-administered accountability associated with these contexts.
 
|Abstract=This article addresses some ways in which stereotypes and stereotyping are treated as morally accountable by social psychologists, their research participants, and participants in everyday interactions. I focus in particular on closely examining some deployments and responses to stereotypes in everyday interactions by applying conversation analytic and discursive psychological approaches to recorded interactions from radio call-in shows. My analysis considers the different interactional trajectories that follow the production of (possible) racial stereotypes, demonstrating how participants treat their “inaccuracy” as a central basis for the production of challenges and moral sanctioning in response to their deployment. In addition, the analysis demonstrates some cases in which apparent stereotypes are accepted or aligned with, including those grounded in personal experiences, “self-stereotypes,” and humorous uses of stereotypes. I conclude by considering the implications of attending to the social–moral contexts in which stereotypes are produced, and the participant-administered accountability associated with these contexts.
 
 
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 06:30, 15 June 2018

Whitehead2018
BibType ARTICLE
Key Whitehead2017
Author(s) Kevin A. Whitehead
Title Managing the Moral Accountability of Stereotyping
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, In Press, Stereotyping, Morality, Discursive Psychology, Radio
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Journal of Language and Social Psychology
Volume 37
Number 3
Pages 288 –309
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17723679
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article addresses some ways in which stereotypes and stereotyping are treated as morally accountable by social psychologists, their research participants, and participants in everyday interactions. I focus in particular on closely examining some deployments and responses to stereotypes in everyday interactions by applying conversation analytic and discursive psychological approaches to recorded interactions from radio call-in shows. My analysis considers the different interactional trajectories that follow the production of (possible) racial stereotypes, demonstrating how participants treat their “inaccuracy” as a central basis for the production of challenges and moral sanctioning in response to their deployment. In addition, the analysis demonstrates some cases in which apparent stereotypes are accepted or aligned with, including those grounded in personal experiences, “self-stereotypes,” and humorous uses of stereotypes. I conclude by considering the implications of attending to the social–moral contexts in which stereotypes are produced, and the participant-administered accountability associated with these contexts.

Notes