Webb2020

From emcawiki
Revision as of 01:40, 23 April 2020 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search
Webb2020
BibType ARTICLE
Key Webb2020
Author(s) Joseph Webb, Val Williams, Marina Gall, Sandra Dowling
Title Misfitting the Research Process: Shaping Qualitative Research “in the Field” to Fit People Living With Dementia
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, dementia, ethics, methods in qualitative inquiry, observational research, conversation analysis, community-based research, case study, In Press
Publisher
Year 2020
Language English
City
Month
Journal International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Volume 19
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1609406919895926
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

It is increasingly recognized that people living with dementia should be included in qualitative research that foregrounds their voices, but traditional research approaches can leave less room for flexibility than is necessary. This article builds on others who have examined the challenges and rewards of the qualitative research process with people living with dementia. With reference to a specific project on communication and dementia, the research design adaptations needed at each step to turn a ?misfit? into a ?fit? are examined. Misfitting, as a concept related to social practice theories, is used to argue the need for a coproduced and flexible approach to research design and data collection. Recommendations include being willing to adapt research methods, data collection locations, and aims of the project to fit participants? competencies, preferences, and realities; spending sufficient time getting to get to know staff and potential participants to build relationships; working round care practices and routines to minimize disruption; and using observational/visual methods can help include people living with dementia at each stage. People with dementia require researchers in the field to be creative in their methods, reflexive in their approach, and person-centered in their goals. Those adaptations can fundamentally change the ways in which the social practice of research is shaped.

Notes