Velkovska-Moustafa2012

From emcawiki
Revision as of 08:39, 22 June 2019 by PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Julia Velkovska; Zouinar Moustafa; |Title=Jugements et émotions dans les interactions institutionnelles |Tag(s)=EMCA; Judgement; Emotio...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Velkovska-Moustafa2012
BibType ARTICLE
Key Velkovska-Moustafa2012
Author(s) Julia Velkovska, Zouinar Moustafa
Title Jugements et émotions dans les interactions institutionnelles
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Judgement, Emotion, Institutional Interactions
Publisher ethnographiques.org: Revue en ligne de sciences humaines et sociales
Year 2012
Language French
City
Month
Journal ethnographiques.org
Volume 25
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished Internet Journal
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

"Judgments and emotions in institutional interactions". The main focus of this paper is on moral judgments as constitutive elements of the in situ relationship between institutions and their users. It explores how ordinary moral judgments and emotions are articulated with professional evaluative practices in the structure of institutional interactions, and how they shape the interview in progress. Based on video recordings of interviews between unemployed people and counselors representing the French public employment agency, the analysis focuses on the moment-by-moment organization of judgmental work and its embeddedness in bodily conduct, especially through expression of emotions. Drawing on ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and membership categorization analysis, the article shows that evaluating as an activity cannot be grasped from the standpoint of formal predefined criteria (whether applied or distorted). Detailed examination of the interviews provides empirical evidence for the fact that professional evaluation is interwoven with ordinary moral judgments and emotions at precise moments of the institutional interaction. This approach renders visible structural aspects of professional judgment work that remain otherwise inaccessible, notably its moral, emotional and relational dimensions.

Notes