Difference between revisions of "VanCharldorp-2011"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
|BibType=PHDTHESIS
+
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Tessa C. Van Charldorp;
+
|Author(s)=Tessa C. van Charldorp;
 
|Title=The coordination of talk and typing in police interrogations
 
|Title=The coordination of talk and typing in police interrogations
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Police-Suspect Interview; Police Records
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Police-Suspect Interview; Police Records
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Journal=Crossroads for Language, Interaction and Culture
 
|Journal=Crossroads for Language, Interaction and Culture
 
|Volume=8
 
|Volume=8
|Pages=61-92
+
|Pages=61–92
|URL=citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.461.5788&rep=rep1&type=pdf
+
|URL=https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2h1110cs
|Note=PhD Thesis
+
|Abstract=In this article, I examine the conduct and coordination of two activities that are relevant in the Dutch police interrogation: talking and typing. By taking a closer look at these activities, I can see how the police record is mutually constructed by officers and suspects and begin to understand what kind of orientation is required for these dual activities. Additionally, I explore how participants orient to and coordinate talking and typing during interrogations and explicate what this tells us about the ways institutional tasks are carried out in this specific environment. I have found that police officers not only structure talk during interrogations, but that their typing activities function as institutional, controlling actions when talk is transformed to text during the interrogations.
|Abstract=Tis  thesis  is  about  the construction of a  suspect’s police  record. Tis  record  is
 
constructed by one or  two police ofcers  in an  interrogation room and  is based
 
on the  interaction that takes place between the police ofcer(s) and the suspect.  
 
Terefore, the construction of a police record is accomplished through interaction.
 
Te ofcer generally asks questions and the suspect generally answers the questions.
 
While interrogating, the ofcer types up the record on his or her computer. Tis is
 
the general way in which police records are constructed in the Netherlands.
 
  Te aim of this thesis is to make the interactional origin of the written police
 
record  visible. In other words, I will  investigate  the  interactional  construction  of
 
the written police record. How this record is constructed cannot be seen from the
 
written  version  of  the document. Questions  are ofen  lef  out and negotiations
 
have no trace in the written document. Most police records are presented as frst-
 
person narratives but they are not always written in the words of the suspect. Te
 
similarities between  the  talk and  the  text, but also  the alterations, additions and
 
deletions and how they came about will be investigated thoroughly in this thesis.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 02:37, 28 November 2019

VanCharldorp-2011
BibType ARTICLE
Key VanCharldorp-2011
Author(s) Tessa C. van Charldorp
Title The coordination of talk and typing in police interrogations
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Police-Suspect Interview, Police Records
Publisher
Year 2011
Language English
City
Month
Journal Crossroads for Language, Interaction and Culture
Volume 8
Number
Pages 61–92
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this article, I examine the conduct and coordination of two activities that are relevant in the Dutch police interrogation: talking and typing. By taking a closer look at these activities, I can see how the police record is mutually constructed by officers and suspects and begin to understand what kind of orientation is required for these dual activities. Additionally, I explore how participants orient to and coordinate talking and typing during interrogations and explicate what this tells us about the ways institutional tasks are carried out in this specific environment. I have found that police officers not only structure talk during interrogations, but that their typing activities function as institutional, controlling actions when talk is transformed to text during the interrogations.

Notes