Tudini-Strambi2017

From emcawiki
Revision as of 18:25, 7 December 2017 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Vincenza Tudini; Antonella Strambi |Title=“Siamo vicini, no?”: Negotiating commonality for rapport building in Italian L1-L2 online...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Tudini-Strambi2017
BibType ARTICLE
Key Tudini-Strambi2017
Author(s) Vincenza Tudini, Antonella Strambi
Title “Siamo vicini, no?”: Negotiating commonality for rapport building in Italian L1-L2 online text chat
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Online Interaction, Relationships, Wellbeing
Publisher
Year 2017
Language English
City
Month
Journal Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Volume 40
Number 2
Pages 194-211
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/aral.40.2.07tud
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Focusing specifically on the negotiation of commonality, this study explores rapport building ( Spencer-Oatey, 2000 ) in online intercultural text chat, where Australian students of Italian interact with L1 Italian speakers. Although the initial purpose of the examined chat exchanges is to facilitate L2 acquisition, analysis of transcripts indicates that participants also seek to establish affiliation and friendship, through discussion of shared experiences, preferred leisure activities, and personal likings. Such orientation to like-mindedness and commonality can be an implicit concern in their interactions, as well as an explicit mentionable in their talk. Participants also successfully engage in complex face-saving and rapport maintenance strategies where there is potential for disagreement. Overall, the data suggest that identified rapport-building language and behaviors promote the establishment of positive relationships, as a key component of online intercultural text chat. Thus, from a pedagogical viewpoint, these interactions appear beneficial both for L2 learning and student wellbeing. The study concludes with suggestions for the integration of similar tasks into language programs.

Notes