Difference between revisions of "TenHave2002c"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Paul ten Have;
 
|Author(s)=Paul ten Have;
|Title=‘Ontology or methodology? Comments on ‘Natural’ and ‘Contrived’ Data: A Sustainable Distinction?, by  Susan Speer’
+
|Title=Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speer's `natural' and `contrived' data: a sustainable distinction?
|Tag(s)=Data quality; EMCA;  
+
|Tag(s)=Data quality; EMCA;
 
|Key=TenHave2002c
 
|Key=TenHave2002c
 
|Year=2002
 
|Year=2002
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=4
 
|Volume=4
 
|Number=4
 
|Number=4
|Pages=527-30
+
|Pages=527-530
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 11:17, 13 October 2014

TenHave2002c
BibType ARTICLE
Key TenHave2002c
Author(s) Paul ten Have
Title Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speer's `natural' and `contrived' data: a sustainable distinction?
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Data quality, EMCA
Publisher
Year 2002
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 4
Number 4
Pages 527-530
URL
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract


Notes