Difference between revisions of "TenHave2002c"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Paul ten Have; |Title=‘Ontology or methodology? Comments on ‘Natural’ and ‘Contrived’ Data: A Sustainable Distinction?, by S...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Paul ten Have;  
+
|Author(s)=Paul ten Have;
|Title=‘Ontology or methodology? Comments on ‘Natural’ and ‘Contrived’ Data: A Sustainable Distinction?, by  Susan Speer’
+
|Title=Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speer's “natural” and “contrived” data: a sustainable distinction?
|Tag(s)=Data quality
+
|Tag(s)=Data quality; EMCA;
 
|Key=TenHave2002c
 
|Key=TenHave2002c
 
|Year=2002
 
|Year=2002
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=4
 
|Volume=4
 
|Number=4
 
|Number=4
|Pages=527-30
+
|Pages=527–530
 +
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614456020040040701
 +
|DOI=10.1177/14614456020040040701
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 01:13, 30 October 2019

TenHave2002c
BibType ARTICLE
Key TenHave2002c
Author(s) Paul ten Have
Title Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speer's “natural” and “contrived” data: a sustainable distinction?
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Data quality, EMCA
Publisher
Year 2002
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 4
Number 4
Pages 527–530
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/14614456020040040701
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract


Notes