Difference between revisions of "Svensson-etal2009"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(url)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|Number=6
 
|Number=6
 
|Pages=889–906
 
|Pages=889–906
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01195.x
+
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01195.x
 
|DOI=10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01195.x
 
|DOI=10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01195.x
|Abstract=In this paper we address the ways in which surgeons, in collaboration with other
+
|Note=Reprinted in: Alison Pilnick, Jon Hindmarsh, Virginia Teas Gill, eds, (2010) Communication in healthcare settings: participation, policy and new technologies. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell: 99-116
members of the surgical team, create occasions for demonstration and instruction
+
|Abstract=In this paper we address the ways in which surgeons, in collaboration with other members of the surgical team, create occasions for demonstration and instruction within the highly complex and demanding tasks of a surgical operation. Drawing on video recordings of surgical operations, augmented by field studies, we examine how particular phenomena and procedures are made accessible and intelligible to trainees and the ways in which brief episodes of insight and instruction enable complex procedures to be followed and understood. We consider the ways in which demonstration and instruction are achieved, whilst preserving the integrity of medical practice, and explore how trainees are provided with the opportunity to witness, and learn from, the contingent deployment of formal procedures in particular cases. We conclude by considering our observations in the light of recent discussions of practice and situated learning in healthcare training.
within the highly complex and demanding tasks of a surgical operation. Drawing
 
on video recordings of surgical operations, augmented by field studies, we
 
examine how particular phenomena and procedures are made accessible and
 
intelligible to trainees and the ways in which brief episodes of insight and
 
instruction enable complex procedures to be followed and understood. We
 
consider the ways in which demonstration and instruction are achieved, whilst
 
preserving the integrity of medical practice, and explore how trainees are
 
provided with the opportunity to witness, and learn from, the contingent
 
deployment of formal procedures in particular cases.We conclude by considering
 
our observations in the light of recent discussions of practice and situated
 
learning in healthcare training.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 03:27, 23 November 2019

Svensson-etal2009
BibType ARTICLE
Key Svensson-etal2009
Author(s) Marcus Sanchez Svensson, Paul Luff, Christian Heath
Title Embedding instruction in practice: contingency and collaboration during surgical training
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, social interaction, training, surgical operations, interaction analysis
Publisher
Year 2009
Language English
City
Month
Journal Sociology of Health & Illness
Volume 31
Number 6
Pages 889–906
URL Link
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01195.x
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this paper we address the ways in which surgeons, in collaboration with other members of the surgical team, create occasions for demonstration and instruction within the highly complex and demanding tasks of a surgical operation. Drawing on video recordings of surgical operations, augmented by field studies, we examine how particular phenomena and procedures are made accessible and intelligible to trainees and the ways in which brief episodes of insight and instruction enable complex procedures to be followed and understood. We consider the ways in which demonstration and instruction are achieved, whilst preserving the integrity of medical practice, and explore how trainees are provided with the opportunity to witness, and learn from, the contingent deployment of formal procedures in particular cases. We conclude by considering our observations in the light of recent discussions of practice and situated learning in healthcare training.

Notes

Reprinted in: Alison Pilnick, Jon Hindmarsh, Virginia Teas Gill, eds, (2010) Communication in healthcare settings: participation, policy and new technologies. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell: 99-116