Sikveland-Stokoe2020

From emcawiki
Revision as of 15:24, 6 November 2020 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Sikveland-Stokoe2020
BibType ARTICLE
Key Sikveland-Stokoe2020
Author(s) Rein Ove Sikveland, Elizabeth Stokoe
Title Should Police Negotiators Ask to “Talk” or “Speak” to Persons in Crisis? Word Selection and Overcoming Resistance to Dialogue Proposals
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Police-citizen interactions, Word Selection, Managing resistance
Publisher
Year 2020
Language English
City
Month
Journal Research on Language and Social Interaction
Volume 53
Number 3
Pages 324–340
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/08351813.2020.1785770
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article explores whether and how word selection makes some proposals easier to resist than others. Fourteen cases (31 hours) of UK-based police crisis negotiation were analyzed exploring (a) how negotiators use the verbs talk or speak when proposing “dialogue,” and (b) to what extent the strength of resistance of persons in crisis toward the proposals may be attributed to this word selection. We found that persons in crisis were more likely to overtly reject proposals formulated with talk compared to speak. And while negotiators used both talk/speak when proposing dialogue, negotiators and persons in crisis associated talk with more evaluative stances toward dialogue compared to speak. This article has implications for the study of word selection in interaction and for crisis negotiation and other professions where “talk” is promoted as the solution. Data in British English.

Notes