Difference between revisions of "Schrauf2020"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Robert Schrauf |Title=Epistemic responsibility - Labored, loosened, and lost: Staging Alzheimer's disease |Tag(s)=EMCA; Epistemics; Alzh...")
 
m
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics
 
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics
 
|Volume=168
 
|Volume=168
|Number=October 2020
+
|Pages=56–68
|Pages=56-68
 
 
|URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216620301600
 
|URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216620301600
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.07.003
+
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2020.07.003
 
|Abstract=Interlocutors hold one another accountable for knowing certain information about themselves (their roles, activities, and memories) and for keeping track of information in the current conversational exchange. When speakers have trouble with this expectation, they themselves work to repair the breach, often doing a memory search, or when unsuccessful they provide an account (e.g. “I don't remember”). Memory searches (like word searches) are observable, interactional accomplishments. Speakers disengage with their interlocutors (look away), produce hesitation markers, take repeated pauses, engage in pre-positioned and post-positioned repairs, make epistemic assessments, and on finding an answer, re-engage with their interlocutors (look back). For their part, interlocutors comply with the search by not interrupting and continuing to yield the floor. At progressively severe stages of Alzheimer's disease, individuals exhibit increasingly labored memory searches that often trail off into non-answers, until at the latest stages, they eschew the search and (almost smoothly) provide either grammatically appropriate but wrong and improbable answers or give answers to previous questions on now closed topics. With data from the clinical administration of a disease staging instrument (Clinical Dementia Rating) this article examines the inexorable loss of epistemic responsibility as a key discursive dynamic in the progression of the disease.
 
|Abstract=Interlocutors hold one another accountable for knowing certain information about themselves (their roles, activities, and memories) and for keeping track of information in the current conversational exchange. When speakers have trouble with this expectation, they themselves work to repair the breach, often doing a memory search, or when unsuccessful they provide an account (e.g. “I don't remember”). Memory searches (like word searches) are observable, interactional accomplishments. Speakers disengage with their interlocutors (look away), produce hesitation markers, take repeated pauses, engage in pre-positioned and post-positioned repairs, make epistemic assessments, and on finding an answer, re-engage with their interlocutors (look back). For their part, interlocutors comply with the search by not interrupting and continuing to yield the floor. At progressively severe stages of Alzheimer's disease, individuals exhibit increasingly labored memory searches that often trail off into non-answers, until at the latest stages, they eschew the search and (almost smoothly) provide either grammatically appropriate but wrong and improbable answers or give answers to previous questions on now closed topics. With data from the clinical administration of a disease staging instrument (Clinical Dementia Rating) this article examines the inexorable loss of epistemic responsibility as a key discursive dynamic in the progression of the disease.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 09:30, 6 November 2020

Schrauf2020
BibType ARTICLE
Key Schrauf2020
Author(s) Robert Schrauf
Title Epistemic responsibility - Labored, loosened, and lost: Staging Alzheimer's disease
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Epistemics, Alzheimer's, Memory search, Dementia, Accountability
Publisher
Year 2020
Language English
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 168
Number
Pages 56–68
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.07.003
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Interlocutors hold one another accountable for knowing certain information about themselves (their roles, activities, and memories) and for keeping track of information in the current conversational exchange. When speakers have trouble with this expectation, they themselves work to repair the breach, often doing a memory search, or when unsuccessful they provide an account (e.g. “I don't remember”). Memory searches (like word searches) are observable, interactional accomplishments. Speakers disengage with their interlocutors (look away), produce hesitation markers, take repeated pauses, engage in pre-positioned and post-positioned repairs, make epistemic assessments, and on finding an answer, re-engage with their interlocutors (look back). For their part, interlocutors comply with the search by not interrupting and continuing to yield the floor. At progressively severe stages of Alzheimer's disease, individuals exhibit increasingly labored memory searches that often trail off into non-answers, until at the latest stages, they eschew the search and (almost smoothly) provide either grammatically appropriate but wrong and improbable answers or give answers to previous questions on now closed topics. With data from the clinical administration of a disease staging instrument (Clinical Dementia Rating) this article examines the inexorable loss of epistemic responsibility as a key discursive dynamic in the progression of the disease.

Notes