Roever-Kasper2018

From emcawiki
Revision as of 04:33, 24 June 2018 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Carsten Roever; Gabriele Kasper; Carsten Roever |Title=Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct i...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Roever-Kasper2018
BibType ARTICLE
Key Roever-Kasper2018
Author(s) Carsten Roever, Gabriele Kasper, Carsten Roever
Title Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Interactional competence, Repair, Sequence organization, Validity
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Language Testing
Volume 35
Number 3
Pages 331-355
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758128
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In the assessment of speaking, a psycholinguistically based speaking construct has predominated. In this paper, we argue for the integration of the construct of interactional competence (IC) in speaking assessments to broaden the range of defensible inferences from speaking tests. IC emphasizes the co-constructed nature of interaction and enables the rating of L2 users’ ability to deploy interactional tools that lead to shared understandings. Recent work on IC shows that levels of development can be distinguished, for example, in the sequential organization of social actions such as requests and refusals. This can in turn inform interactionally specific ratings. Furthermore, an IC perspective allows a fine-grained analysis of interactions between examiners and test takers to detect effects of examiner talk. Apparent misunderstandings or disfluencies by test takers can be examiner-induced with the test taker’s response actually demonstrating interactional ability rather than lack of proficiency. We argue that inclusion of IC as a construct in testing speaking opens new perspectives on oral proficiency and enhances the validity of speaking assessments.

Notes