Difference between revisions of "Potter2019"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Jonathan Potter;
 
|Author(s)=Jonathan Potter;
|Title=Action and representation A comment on Batel and Castro Re‐opening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology
+
|Title=Action and representation: A comment on Batel and Castro 'Re‐opening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology'
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Discursive Psychology; Theory; Thematic analysis; Interviews; Communication; Qualitative research; Action
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Discursive Psychology; Theory; Thematic analysis; Interviews; Communication; Qualitative research; Action
 
|Key=Potter2019
 
|Key=Potter2019
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Volume=58
 
|Volume=58
 
|Number=2
 
|Number=2
|Pages=410-414
+
|Pages=410–414
 
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjso.12275
 
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjso.12275
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12275
+
|DOI=10.1111/bjso.12275
 
|Abstract=Batel and Castro propose a reconciliation of social representation theory and discursive psychology. This comment highlights the continuing relevance of long‐standing critiques of social representation theory from discursive psychologists as well as their central focus on both how representations are built to appear factual and the role of representations in practices. It suggests that the analytic approaches proposed by Batel and Castro (e.g., focus groups and thematic analysis) are not sufficient to the analytic task. The proposed ‘Pragmatic Discourse Analysis’ falls short on its central task of identifying pragmatics. The virtues of working with naturalistic data using methods that attend to the action orientation of talk and text are pressed.
 
|Abstract=Batel and Castro propose a reconciliation of social representation theory and discursive psychology. This comment highlights the continuing relevance of long‐standing critiques of social representation theory from discursive psychologists as well as their central focus on both how representations are built to appear factual and the role of representations in practices. It suggests that the analytic approaches proposed by Batel and Castro (e.g., focus groups and thematic analysis) are not sufficient to the analytic task. The proposed ‘Pragmatic Discourse Analysis’ falls short on its central task of identifying pragmatics. The virtues of working with naturalistic data using methods that attend to the action orientation of talk and text are pressed.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 09:42, 16 January 2020

Potter2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Potter2019
Author(s) Jonathan Potter
Title Action and representation: A comment on Batel and Castro 'Re‐opening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology'
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Discursive Psychology, Theory, Thematic analysis, Interviews, Communication, Qualitative research, Action
Publisher
Year 2019
Language English
City
Month
Journal British Journal of Social Psychology
Volume 58
Number 2
Pages 410–414
URL Link
DOI 10.1111/bjso.12275
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Batel and Castro propose a reconciliation of social representation theory and discursive psychology. This comment highlights the continuing relevance of long‐standing critiques of social representation theory from discursive psychologists as well as their central focus on both how representations are built to appear factual and the role of representations in practices. It suggests that the analytic approaches proposed by Batel and Castro (e.g., focus groups and thematic analysis) are not sufficient to the analytic task. The proposed ‘Pragmatic Discourse Analysis’ falls short on its central task of identifying pragmatics. The virtues of working with naturalistic data using methods that attend to the action orientation of talk and text are pressed.

Notes