Difference between revisions of "Pika-etal2018"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
|Year=2018
 
|Year=2018
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
|Month=jun
 
 
|Journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
 
|Journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
 
|Volume=285
 
|Volume=285
 
|Number=1880
 
|Number=1880
 +
|Pages=20180598
 
|URL=http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/lookup/doi/10.1098/rspb.2018.0598
 
|URL=http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/lookup/doi/10.1098/rspb.2018.0598
 
|DOI=10.1098/rspb.2018.0598
 
|DOI=10.1098/rspb.2018.0598
 
|Abstract=Language, humans' most distinctive trait, still remains a ‘mystery' for evolutionary theory. It is underpinned by a universal infrastructure—cooperative turn-taking—which has been suggested as an ancient mechanism bridging the existing gap between the articulate human species and their inarticulate primate cousins. However, we know remarkably little about turn-taking systems of non-human animals, and methodological confounds have often prevented meaningful cross-species comparisons. Thus, the extent to which cooperative turn-taking is uniquely human or represents a homologous and/or analogous trait is currently unknown. The present paper draws attention to this promising research avenue by providing an overview of the state of the art of turn-taking in four animal taxa—birds, mammals, insects and anurans. It concludes with a new comparative framework to spur more research into this research domain and to test which elements of the human turn-taking system are shared across species and taxa.
 
|Abstract=Language, humans' most distinctive trait, still remains a ‘mystery' for evolutionary theory. It is underpinned by a universal infrastructure—cooperative turn-taking—which has been suggested as an ancient mechanism bridging the existing gap between the articulate human species and their inarticulate primate cousins. However, we know remarkably little about turn-taking systems of non-human animals, and methodological confounds have often prevented meaningful cross-species comparisons. Thus, the extent to which cooperative turn-taking is uniquely human or represents a homologous and/or analogous trait is currently unknown. The present paper draws attention to this promising research avenue by providing an overview of the state of the art of turn-taking in four animal taxa—birds, mammals, insects and anurans. It concludes with a new comparative framework to spur more research into this research domain and to test which elements of the human turn-taking system are shared across species and taxa.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 03:15, 11 January 2020

Pika-etal2018
BibType ARTICLE
Key Pika-etal2018
Author(s) Simone Pika, Ray Wilkinson, Kobin H. Kendrick, Sonja C. Vernes
Title Taking turns: bridging the gap between human and animal communication
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Turn-taking, animal communication
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume 285
Number 1880
Pages 20180598
URL Link
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2018.0598
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Language, humans' most distinctive trait, still remains a ‘mystery' for evolutionary theory. It is underpinned by a universal infrastructure—cooperative turn-taking—which has been suggested as an ancient mechanism bridging the existing gap between the articulate human species and their inarticulate primate cousins. However, we know remarkably little about turn-taking systems of non-human animals, and methodological confounds have often prevented meaningful cross-species comparisons. Thus, the extent to which cooperative turn-taking is uniquely human or represents a homologous and/or analogous trait is currently unknown. The present paper draws attention to this promising research avenue by providing an overview of the state of the art of turn-taking in four animal taxa—birds, mammals, insects and anurans. It concludes with a new comparative framework to spur more research into this research domain and to test which elements of the human turn-taking system are shared across species and taxa.

Notes