Difference between revisions of "Pietikainen2018a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Kaisa S. Pietikäinen |Title=Silence that speaks: The local inferences of withholding a response in intercultural couples' conflicts |T...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 09:04, 13 June 2019

Pietikainen2018a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Pietikainen2018a
Author(s) Kaisa S. Pietikäinen
Title Silence that speaks: The local inferences of withholding a response in intercultural couples' conflicts
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Silence, Conflict, Conversation analysis, English as a lingua franca, Intercultural relationships
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Journal of pragmatics
Volume 129
Number
Pages 76-89
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.017
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Conversation analysts commonly agree that speakers tend to minimize gaps between adjacency pairs, and that silence in this position is likely to indicate trouble. However, there are surprisingly few sequential analyses that investigate what kinds of trouble si- lences indicate, particularly in conflict interactions and in intercultural contexts. This paper examines the practice of withholding a response as an interactionally meaningful device in domestic disputes among couples who use English as their common lingua franca (ELF). By investigating the ways in which these speakers orient to transition-relevance place si- lences in the subsequent turns, it is concluded that noticeable silences in domestic ELF conflict talk are treated by the interlocutors as marking the following: 1) avoiding self- incriminating second pair-parts, 2) resisting laughable-initiated changes of footing, 3) sustained disagreement, 4) taking offence, or 5) unsuccessful persuasion. The most com- mon ways in which the speakers then orient to such silences are also reviewed. The analysis shows that turn-by-turn micro-analysis is an efficient methodology for examining the situational inferences of silence-in-interaction.

Notes