https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=Persson2015a&feed=atom&action=historyPersson2015a - Revision history2024-03-29T08:58:56ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.31.1https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=Persson2015a&diff=25653&oldid=prevPaultenHave: Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Rasmus Persson; |Title=Indexing one’s own previous action as inadequate: On ah-prefaced repeats as receipt tokens in French talk-in-in..."2020-04-13T12:08:37Z<p>Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Rasmus Persson; |Title=Indexing one’s own previous action as inadequate: On ah-prefaced repeats as receipt tokens in French talk-in-in..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{BibEntry<br />
|BibType=ARTICLE<br />
|Author(s)=Rasmus Persson;<br />
|Title=Indexing one’s own previous action as inadequate: On ah-prefaced repeats as receipt tokens in French talk-in-interaction<br />
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Speech Prosody; Conversation Analysis; French language; French linguistics; Intersubjectivity; French; talk-in-interaction; repetition; receipts; particles; indexicality; intersubjectivity; prosody; phonetics<br />
|Key=Persson2015a<br />
|Year=2015<br />
|Language=English<br />
|Journal=Language in Society<br />
|Volume=44<br />
|Pages=497– 524<br />
|DOI=10.1017/S004740451500041X<br />
|Abstract=Indexing one<br />
’<br />
s own previous action as inadequate: On<br />
ah<br />
-prefaced repeats as receipt tokens in Frenchtalk-in-interaction<br />
This article considers a practice in French talk-in-interaction, formally char-acterized as other-repeats prefaced by the change-of-state particle ah. Thetarget practice accomplishes aclaim of receipt, while at the same time index-ing as somehow inadequate a previous turn by the receipt speaker. Evidencedrawn upon includes: (i) the sequential locations of the examined phenome-non; (ii) ensuing developments of the sequence, wherein the indexed inade-quacy is more explicitly acknowledged; and (iii) the discriminability of thefocal practice with respect to alternative practices. Two phonetically distin-guished variants of the practice, and their respective sequential projections(‘problematizing’ topicalization or ‘accepting’<br />
closure), are discussed. Thisarticle contributes to the study of how intersubjectivity is managed and ad-ministered by participants, and to research on the management of account-ability for producing ‘adequate’ turns and actions. Finally, it addressesongoing discussions concerning the analysis of multiple actions (first- andsecond-order) conveyed simultaneously in single turns.<br />
}}</div>PaultenHave