Difference between revisions of "Peckitt2019"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
 
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
 
|Author(s)=Katherine Peckitt; Cordet Smart
 
|Author(s)=Katherine Peckitt; Cordet Smart
|Title=Conversation Analysis of Psychological Formulation Discussions in Adult Learning Disabilities Teams
+
|Title=Conversation analysis of psychological formulation discussions in adult learning disabilities teams
|Editor(s)=C. Smart; T. Auburn;
+
|Editor(s)=Cordet Smart; Timothy Auburn
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Clinical conversation; Formulation
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Clinical conversation; Formulation
 
|Key=Peckitt2019
 
|Key=Peckitt2019
 +
|Publisher=Palgrave Macmillan
 
|Year=2019
 
|Year=2019
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
|Booktitle=Interprofessional Care and Mental Health. The Language of Mental Health
+
|Address=Cham
|Pages=147-167
+
|Booktitle=Interprofessional Care and Mental Health: A Discursive Exploration of Team Meeting Practices
 +
|Pages=147–167
 
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_7
 
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_7
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_7
+
|DOI=10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_7
 
|Abstract=This research used CA to analyse the interactional processes between clinical psychologists and their healthcare colleagues, specifically with a focus on psychological formulation discussions. CA identified that formulation discussions did not regularly take place, contrary to clinical psychologist professions’ claims that these discussions happen informally through clinicians ‘chipping in’. However, when formulation discussions occurred, some of the interactions appeared to change the understanding about the service users’ difficulties or gave space for the discussion of delicate topics.
 
|Abstract=This research used CA to analyse the interactional processes between clinical psychologists and their healthcare colleagues, specifically with a focus on psychological formulation discussions. CA identified that formulation discussions did not regularly take place, contrary to clinical psychologist professions’ claims that these discussions happen informally through clinicians ‘chipping in’. However, when formulation discussions occurred, some of the interactions appeared to change the understanding about the service users’ difficulties or gave space for the discussion of delicate topics.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 17 January 2020

Peckitt2019
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Peckitt2019
Author(s) Katherine Peckitt, Cordet Smart
Title Conversation analysis of psychological formulation discussions in adult learning disabilities teams
Editor(s) Cordet Smart, Timothy Auburn
Tag(s) EMCA, Clinical conversation, Formulation
Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
Year 2019
Language English
City Cham
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 147–167
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_7
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Interprofessional Care and Mental Health: A Discursive Exploration of Team Meeting Practices
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This research used CA to analyse the interactional processes between clinical psychologists and their healthcare colleagues, specifically with a focus on psychological formulation discussions. CA identified that formulation discussions did not regularly take place, contrary to clinical psychologist professions’ claims that these discussions happen informally through clinicians ‘chipping in’. However, when formulation discussions occurred, some of the interactions appeared to change the understanding about the service users’ difficulties or gave space for the discussion of delicate topics.

Notes