Difference between revisions of "P-Watson2018"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (correction of title and abstract)
(once again title correction)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Patrick G. Watson;
 
|Author(s)=Patrick G. Watson;
|Title=The Documentary Method of [Video] Interpretation: A Paradoxical Verdict in a Police-Involved Shooting and Its Consequences for Understanding Crime on Camera
+
|Title=The Documentary Method of (Video) Interpretation: A Paradoxical Verdict in a Police-Involved Shooting and Its Consequences for Understanding Crime on Camera
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Video; Evidence; Perception; Socio-legal studies; Police-involved shootings; Ethnomethodology;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Video; Evidence; Perception; Socio-legal studies; Police-involved shootings; Ethnomethodology;
 
|Key=P-Watson2018
 
|Key=P-Watson2018

Revision as of 11:09, 19 April 2018

P-Watson2018
BibType ARTICLE
Key P-Watson2018
Author(s) Patrick G. Watson
Title The Documentary Method of (Video) Interpretation: A Paradoxical Verdict in a Police-Involved Shooting and Its Consequences for Understanding Crime on Camera
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Video, Evidence, Perception, Socio-legal studies, Police-involved shootings, Ethnomethodology
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Human Studies
Volume 41
Number 1
Pages 121–135
URL
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-017-9448-2
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

On July 27th, 2013, Sammy Yatim was shot and killed by Toronto Police Services’ Constable James Forcillo during a verbal confrontation on a streetcar as Yatim brandished a switchblade knife. Forcillo was charged, initially with second degree murder, and later attempted murder—a decision that confused media commentators as attempted murder is a lesser-and-included offense to second degree murder in Canadian law. In January 2016, Forcillo was found not guilty of second degree murder and guilty of attempted murder. Video evidence, recovered from the streetcar’s onboard security cameras, was described by the presiding judge, Justice Edward Then, as proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Forcillo’s testimony was unreliable, especially in light of other evidence. This paper examines the use of video evidence to arrive at a ‘compromise verdict’ (Gillis in ‘Compromise’ verdict in James Forcillo trial gets mixed reaction. Toronto Star, 25 January, 2016) and the paradox of being convicted of attempting to murder someone who was killed.

Notes