Difference between revisions of "Munalim-Genuino2019"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Leonardo O. Munalim; Cecilia F. Genuino; |Title=“Through-Produced” Multiple Questions in Tagalog-English Faculty Meetings: Setting t...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Leonardo O. Munalim; Cecilia F. Genuino; | |Author(s)=Leonardo O. Munalim; Cecilia F. Genuino; | ||
| − | |Title=“Through- | + | |Title=“Through-produced” multiple questions in Tagalog-English faculty meetings: setting the agenda dimension of questions |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Questions; Agenda-setting; Question-answer sequence; Faculty meeting; Meeting; Framing | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Questions; Agenda-setting; Question-answer sequence; Faculty meeting; Meeting; Framing | ||
|Key=Munalim-Genuino2019 | |Key=Munalim-Genuino2019 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=4 | |Volume=4 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=105–122 |
|URL=http://www.languageart.ir/index.php/LA/article/view/95 | |URL=http://www.languageart.ir/index.php/LA/article/view/95 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.22046/LA.2019.12 |
|Abstract=This study describes the sequential pattern of “through-produced” multiple questions using Conversation Analysis that sets the agenda dimension of questions, and the academic conditions that advance its use during turns at talk from five faculty meetings. Results show that a. No first-pair of the “through-produced” questions has been answered; b. the answers to the second-pair questions are achieved through paraphrases, clarifications, keyword repetitions, and circuitous rephrasing until the hearer conforms with the agenda set; c. The subordinates frame their default identities with lower epistemic knowledge, and d. “Through-produced” multiple questions can be a manifestation of Chair’s power. Implications and recommendations for cross-linguistic comparisons are offered to generalize the findings beyond the specific domain of the meeting. | |Abstract=This study describes the sequential pattern of “through-produced” multiple questions using Conversation Analysis that sets the agenda dimension of questions, and the academic conditions that advance its use during turns at talk from five faculty meetings. Results show that a. No first-pair of the “through-produced” questions has been answered; b. the answers to the second-pair questions are achieved through paraphrases, clarifications, keyword repetitions, and circuitous rephrasing until the hearer conforms with the agenda set; c. The subordinates frame their default identities with lower epistemic knowledge, and d. “Through-produced” multiple questions can be a manifestation of Chair’s power. Implications and recommendations for cross-linguistic comparisons are offered to generalize the findings beyond the specific domain of the meeting. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:03, 17 January 2020
| Munalim-Genuino2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Munalim-Genuino2019 |
| Author(s) | Leonardo O. Munalim, Cecilia F. Genuino |
| Title | “Through-produced” multiple questions in Tagalog-English faculty meetings: setting the agenda dimension of questions |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Questions, Agenda-setting, Question-answer sequence, Faculty meeting, Meeting, Framing |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language Art |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 105–122 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.22046/LA.2019.12 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This study describes the sequential pattern of “through-produced” multiple questions using Conversation Analysis that sets the agenda dimension of questions, and the academic conditions that advance its use during turns at talk from five faculty meetings. Results show that a. No first-pair of the “through-produced” questions has been answered; b. the answers to the second-pair questions are achieved through paraphrases, clarifications, keyword repetitions, and circuitous rephrasing until the hearer conforms with the agenda set; c. The subordinates frame their default identities with lower epistemic knowledge, and d. “Through-produced” multiple questions can be a manifestation of Chair’s power. Implications and recommendations for cross-linguistic comparisons are offered to generalize the findings beyond the specific domain of the meeting.
Notes
