Difference between revisions of "Mondada2019a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Lorenza Mondada |Title=Rethinking Bodies and Objects in Social Interaction: A Multimodal and Multisensorial Approach to Tasting |Ed...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
 
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
 
|Author(s)=Lorenza Mondada
 
|Author(s)=Lorenza Mondada
|Title=Rethinking Bodies and Objects in Social Interaction: A Multimodal and Multisensorial Approach to Tasting
+
|Title=Rethinking bodies and objects in social interaction: a multimodal and multisensorial approach to tasting
|Editor(s)=U. Kissman; J. van Loon;
+
|Editor(s)=Ulrike Tikvah Kissmann; Joost  van Loon
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Body; Materiality; Multimodality; Multisensoriality; Tasting; Video
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Body; Materiality; Multimodality; Multisensoriality; Tasting; Video
 
|Key=Mondada2019a
 
|Key=Mondada2019a
 +
|Publisher=Springer VS
 
|Year=2019
 
|Year=2019
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
|Booktitle=Discussing New Materialism
+
|Address=Wiesbaden
|Pages=109-134
+
|Booktitle=Discussing New Materialism: Methodological Implications for the Study of Materialities
 +
|Pages=109–134
 
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-22300-7_6
 
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-22300-7_6
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22300-7_6
+
|DOI=10.1007/978-3-658-22300-7_6
 
|Abstract=This chapter reflects on the contributions of ethnomethodology and multimodal conversation analysis to current debates about materiality, including both bodies and objects as they are mobilized, made accountable, seen and interpreted by participants within social interaction. Video studies have enabled a new detailed analytical gaze on multimodality – including language, the body, and the manipulation of objects. In this chapter, I show that multimodality can be farther developed by taking into account how sensoriality is intersubjectively achieved in social interaction. The chapter discusses the conceptual, analytical, and methodological challenges that this constitutes for the approach of materialities in human action. Using the video recording of a tasting session as an exemplary empirical case, the analysis shows how participants orchestrate their bodies as both communicating bodies and sensing bodies. Moreover, it shows how the multimodally organized activity of tasting manipulates different types of objects, materials to be tasted, and artifacts supporting tasting. Taking into account not only the multimodality of interactional exchanges (in which embodied and linguistic resources secure a form of intersubjectivity based on the mutual understanding of the participants), but also their multisensoriality (in which the bodies access, feel, and experience the world) invites thinking about a different form of intersubjectivity, in which bodies sense other bodies sensing, and align with other objects within various spatial and material configurations.
 
|Abstract=This chapter reflects on the contributions of ethnomethodology and multimodal conversation analysis to current debates about materiality, including both bodies and objects as they are mobilized, made accountable, seen and interpreted by participants within social interaction. Video studies have enabled a new detailed analytical gaze on multimodality – including language, the body, and the manipulation of objects. In this chapter, I show that multimodality can be farther developed by taking into account how sensoriality is intersubjectively achieved in social interaction. The chapter discusses the conceptual, analytical, and methodological challenges that this constitutes for the approach of materialities in human action. Using the video recording of a tasting session as an exemplary empirical case, the analysis shows how participants orchestrate their bodies as both communicating bodies and sensing bodies. Moreover, it shows how the multimodally organized activity of tasting manipulates different types of objects, materials to be tasted, and artifacts supporting tasting. Taking into account not only the multimodality of interactional exchanges (in which embodied and linguistic resources secure a form of intersubjectivity based on the mutual understanding of the participants), but also their multisensoriality (in which the bodies access, feel, and experience the world) invites thinking about a different form of intersubjectivity, in which bodies sense other bodies sensing, and align with other objects within various spatial and material configurations.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:06, 17 January 2020

Mondada2019a
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Mondada2019a
Author(s) Lorenza Mondada
Title Rethinking bodies and objects in social interaction: a multimodal and multisensorial approach to tasting
Editor(s) Ulrike Tikvah Kissmann, Joost van Loon
Tag(s) EMCA, Body, Materiality, Multimodality, Multisensoriality, Tasting, Video
Publisher Springer VS
Year 2019
Language English
City Wiesbaden
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 109–134
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-22300-7_6
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Discussing New Materialism: Methodological Implications for the Study of Materialities
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the contributions of ethnomethodology and multimodal conversation analysis to current debates about materiality, including both bodies and objects as they are mobilized, made accountable, seen and interpreted by participants within social interaction. Video studies have enabled a new detailed analytical gaze on multimodality – including language, the body, and the manipulation of objects. In this chapter, I show that multimodality can be farther developed by taking into account how sensoriality is intersubjectively achieved in social interaction. The chapter discusses the conceptual, analytical, and methodological challenges that this constitutes for the approach of materialities in human action. Using the video recording of a tasting session as an exemplary empirical case, the analysis shows how participants orchestrate their bodies as both communicating bodies and sensing bodies. Moreover, it shows how the multimodally organized activity of tasting manipulates different types of objects, materials to be tasted, and artifacts supporting tasting. Taking into account not only the multimodality of interactional exchanges (in which embodied and linguistic resources secure a form of intersubjectivity based on the mutual understanding of the participants), but also their multisensoriality (in which the bodies access, feel, and experience the world) invites thinking about a different form of intersubjectivity, in which bodies sense other bodies sensing, and align with other objects within various spatial and material configurations.

Notes