Molian2018

From emcawiki
Revision as of 11:45, 6 December 2018 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Julian Molina |Title=Scrutinising statistics, questioning BME unemployment: the uses of labour market statistics in Parliamentary Select...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Molian2018
BibType ARTICLE
Key Molian2018
Author(s) Julian Molina
Title Scrutinising statistics, questioning BME unemployment: the uses of labour market statistics in Parliamentary Select Committee evidence sessions
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, In press, BME, Workplace Studies, UK
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate, and Practice
Volume
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1332/174426418X15337549905868
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article describes how statistics are scrutinised as evidence. It focuses on the uses of a labour market statistic during House of Commons select committee evidence sessions. The statistic in question was ‘55.5% of economically active black men, aged 16–24, are unemployed’. The article describes how this individual piece of evidence was scrutinised through ‘ordinary’ interactional practices. By drawing on ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, the article describes how questions and answers about this piece of evidence were organised by politicians, policymakers and witnesses. These members accounted for this statistic by expressing horror, questioning and interrupting witnesses, giving analyses of educational attainment, critiquing the validity of the statistic, citing factors such as ‘unconscious bias’, professing they were working hard, and sanctioning witnesses’ answers. The article shows how statistical evidence is both a tool and an object of scrutiny, a basic component for policy deliberation, and how it is interactionally organised through ‘ordinary’ practices.

Notes