Difference between revisions of "Maynard1988a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Douglas W. Maynard; |Title=Narratives and narrative structure in plea bargaining |Tag(s)=EMCA; Narratives; Plea Bargaining; Courtroom I...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Douglas W. Maynard;  
+
|Author(s)=Douglas W. Maynard;
 
|Title=Narratives and narrative structure in plea bargaining
 
|Title=Narratives and narrative structure in plea bargaining
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Narratives; Plea Bargaining; Courtroom Interaction;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Narratives; Plea Bargaining; Courtroom Interaction;
 
|Key=Maynard1988a
 
|Key=Maynard1988a
 
|Year=1988
 
|Year=1988
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Pages=101-133
 
|Pages=101-133
 
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-3719-3_3
 
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-3719-3_3
|Abstract=Recent interest in oral language and law (Atkinson & Drew, 1979; Danet, 1980; Levi, 1985; O’Barr, 1982; Pomerantz & Atkinson, 1984), repeating a characteristic of earlier research on criminal justice (cf. Newman, 1966:xiv, Rosett & Cressey, 1976), gives disproportionate attention to trials and formal proceedings rather than informal processes such as plea bargaining, even though it is in the give-and-take of the more casual setting that practitioners settle the bulk of cases coming before the courts. To be specific, the “explosion” of ethnographic research on plea bargaining during the last 15 years (Maynard, 1984:1) makes it abundantly clear that attorneys often present “facts” by telling stories about “what happened.However, although investigators have explored various dimensions of storytelling in the courtroom (Bennett & Feldman, 1981; O’Barr & Conley, 1985), narratives in the negotiational arena are unstudied and unexplicated.
+
|Abstract=Recent interest in oral language and law (Atkinson & Drew, 1979; Danet, 1980; Levi, 1985; O’Barr, 1982; Pomerantz & Atkinson, 1984), repeating a characteristic of earlier research on criminal justice (cf. Newman, 1966:xiv, Rosett & Cressey, 1976), gives disproportionate attention to trials and formal proceedings rather than informal processes such as plea bargaining, even though it is in the give-and-take of the more casual setting that practitioners settle the bulk of cases coming before the courts. To be specific, the "explosion" of ethnographic research on plea bargaining during the last 15 years (Maynard, 1984:1) makes it abundantly clear that attorneys often present "facts" by telling stories about "what happened." However, although investigators have explored various dimensions of storytelling in the courtroom (Bennett & Feldman, 1981; O’Barr & Conley, 1985), narratives in the negotiational arena are unstudied and unexplicated.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 06:57, 19 May 2017

Maynard1988a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Maynard1988a
Author(s) Douglas W. Maynard
Title Narratives and narrative structure in plea bargaining
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Narratives, Plea Bargaining, Courtroom Interaction
Publisher
Year 1988
Language
City
Month
Journal Law and Society Review
Volume 22
Number
Pages 101-133
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Recent interest in oral language and law (Atkinson & Drew, 1979; Danet, 1980; Levi, 1985; O’Barr, 1982; Pomerantz & Atkinson, 1984), repeating a characteristic of earlier research on criminal justice (cf. Newman, 1966:xiv, Rosett & Cressey, 1976), gives disproportionate attention to trials and formal proceedings rather than informal processes such as plea bargaining, even though it is in the give-and-take of the more casual setting that practitioners settle the bulk of cases coming before the courts. To be specific, the "explosion" of ethnographic research on plea bargaining during the last 15 years (Maynard, 1984:1) makes it abundantly clear that attorneys often present "facts" by telling stories about "what happened." However, although investigators have explored various dimensions of storytelling in the courtroom (Bennett & Feldman, 1981; O’Barr & Conley, 1985), narratives in the negotiational arena are unstudied and unexplicated.

Notes