Maynard1982

From emcawiki
Revision as of 11:57, 11 July 2018 by Clair-AntoineVeyrier (talk | contribs) (key issue)
Jump to: navigation, search
Maynard1982
BibType ARTICLE
Key Maynard1982
Author(s) Douglas W. Maynard
Title Defendant Attributes in Plea Bargaining: Notes on the Modeling of Sentencing Decisions
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Plea Bargaining, Justice
Publisher
Year 1982
Language English
City
Month
Journal Social Problems
Volume 29
Number 4
Pages 347-360
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Previous research on how defendant attributes affect sentencing decisions has relied mainly on "variable analysis." This paper argues that such research improperly models the decision process. In plea bargaining, defendant descriptions are selected from an array of possible attributes. They are related to other descriptions and "facts" of a case, in a contextual manner, to justify a defense or prosecution position regarding sentence. To properly model the relation of defendant attributes to case dispositions, a gestalt framework is required. This would allow the investigation of commonsense reasoning practices and typifications involved in decision-making. The question of whether all defendants receive "equal treatment before the law" is related to what kinds of typifications are employed by lawyers and judges. Where "variable analysis" uses a standard of formal rationality to measure how well the courts administer justice, the standard displayed in plea bargaining is substantive rationality.

Notes