Llewellyn-Whittle2019

From emcawiki
Revision as of 10:24, 17 January 2020 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Llewellyn-Whittle2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Llewellyn-Whittle2019
Author(s) Nick Llewellyn, Andrea Whittle
Title Lies, defeasibility and morality-in-action: The interactional architecture of false claims in sales, telemarketing and debt collection work
Editor(s)
Tag(s) conversation analysis, deceit, ethics, ethnomethodology interaction, lying, EMCA
Publisher
Year 2019
Language English
City
Month
Journal Human Relations
Volume 72
Number 4
Pages 834–858
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/0018726718778093
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Lying is known to be endemic in a range of business settings. However, to date, studies have not analysed how lies surface, and are spontaneously managed, in ‘real time’ interaction. Drawing on video and audio recordings, in this article we analyse how actors account for false claims produced in different settings, namely sales, telemarketing and debt collection. Drawing on resources from ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, lies are conceptualized as products of interactional organization, rather than, say, products of the mind or motives of social actors. Our analysis reveals the centrality of ‘epistemics’ for understanding how people handle, and seek to neutralize, the moral risks associated with false claims. Potential accusations of ‘lying’ are shown to be defeasible in light of claims that the speaker has ‘discovered’, ‘noticed’ or ‘remembered’ some pertinent detail. We recover practices through which false claims are transformed, with varying degrees of success, from nefarious to innocent accountings. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for wider questions about the reproduction of work cultures that rely upon deceit.

Notes