Licoppeetal2017

From emcawiki
Revision as of 02:33, 9 May 2017 by Clair-AntoineVeyrier (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2017-05-09 08:33:19)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Licoppeetal2017
BibType INPROCEEDINGS
Key Licoppeetal2017
Author(s) Christian Licoppe, Paul K. Luff, Christian Heath, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Naomi Yamashita, Sylvaine Tuncer
Title Showing Objects: Holding and Manipulating Artefacts in Video-mediated Collaborative Settings
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Skype, Video-mediated interaction, domestic, embodied interaction, objects
Publisher ACM Press
Year 2017
Language
City New York, New York, USA
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 5295–5306
URL Link
DOI 10.1145/3025453.3025848
ISBN 9781450346559
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this paper we report on a pervasive practice in video-mediated communication: where participants show one another one or more objects. This is a distinct activity from others considered by researchers of video-mediated technologies that focus on a face-to-face orientation, or just on the support necessary to help people to refer to objects. We first present examples of this pervasive phenomenon in naturally occurring Skype conversations, revealing how this conduct is configured and organized within the interaction between participants. We reveal how the subtle adjustment of the position of the body, the head and gaze with respect to the handheld objects offers crucial resources for participants to achieve joint seeing. Then we report on a quite different setting, a naturalistic experiment where participants collaborate on a collective task with remote colleagues through maneuverable, orientable devices (Kubis). Again, in these experiments participants frequently show objects, and at times the devices provide additional resources to support these activities. But at other times they also involve some difficulties. We conclude by suggesting possible technological developments, some quite simple, others more radical, that might support participants to show objects, whether they are in domestic settings or undertaking work activities.

Notes