Difference between revisions of "Lerner-Kitzinger2019"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Gene H. Lerner; Celia Kitzinger; |Title=Well-Prefacing in the Organization of Self-Initiated Repair |Tag(s)=EMCA; Well-prefaced; Self-in...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Gene H. Lerner; Celia Kitzinger;
 
|Author(s)=Gene H. Lerner; Celia Kitzinger;
|Title=Well-Prefacing in the Organization of Self-Initiated Repair
+
|Title=Well-prefacing in the organization of self-initiated repair
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Well-prefaced; Self-initiated repair
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Well-prefaced; Self-initiated repair
 
|Key=Lerner-Kitzinger2019
 
|Key=Lerner-Kitzinger2019
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Volume=52
 
|Volume=52
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
|Pages=1-19
+
|Pages=1–19
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1572376
+
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2019.1572376
 
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2019.1572376
 
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2019.1572376
|Abstract=This report describes the use of well as a preface to repair solutions in self-
+
|Abstract=This report describes the use of well as a preface to repair solutions in self-initiated repair segments. It extends our previous work on repair prefacing, which showed that repair prefaces cast a relationship between a projected repair solution and its trouble source, with each preface type casting this relationship in a distinctive way. Based on analysis of our collection of 135 recorded instances of the phenomenon, we find that well-prefacing is a practice speakers use to overtly cast a repair solution as a noteworthy revision of the inadequate (but not wholly wrong) formulation it is moving away from. We then compare well-prefacing to no-prefacing and introduce the practice of double prefacing by describing well+no-prefacing. We conclude by describing three kinds of repair common among the well-prefaced repairs in our collection. Data are in British and American English.
initiated repair segments. It extends our previous work on repair prefacing,
 
which showed that repair prefaces cast a relationship between a projected
 
repair solution and its trouble source, with each preface type casting this
 
relationship in a distinctive way. Based on analysis of our collection of 135
 
recorded instances of the phenomenon, we find that well-prefacing is
 
a practice speakers use to overtly cast a repair solution as a noteworthy
 
revision of the inadequate (but not wholly wrong) formulation it is moving
 
away from. We then compare well-prefacing to no-prefacing and introduce
 
the practice of double prefacing by describing well+no-prefacing. We con-
 
clude by describing three kinds of repair common among the well-prefaced
 
repairs in our collection. Data are in British and American English.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:34, 17 January 2020

Lerner-Kitzinger2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Lerner-Kitzinger2019
Author(s) Gene H. Lerner, Celia Kitzinger
Title Well-prefacing in the organization of self-initiated repair
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Well-prefaced, Self-initiated repair
Publisher
Year 2019
Language English
City
Month
Journal Research on Language and Social Interaction
Volume 52
Number 1
Pages 1–19
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/08351813.2019.1572376
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This report describes the use of well as a preface to repair solutions in self-initiated repair segments. It extends our previous work on repair prefacing, which showed that repair prefaces cast a relationship between a projected repair solution and its trouble source, with each preface type casting this relationship in a distinctive way. Based on analysis of our collection of 135 recorded instances of the phenomenon, we find that well-prefacing is a practice speakers use to overtly cast a repair solution as a noteworthy revision of the inadequate (but not wholly wrong) formulation it is moving away from. We then compare well-prefacing to no-prefacing and introduce the practice of double prefacing by describing well+no-prefacing. We conclude by describing three kinds of repair common among the well-prefaced repairs in our collection. Data are in British and American English.

Notes